Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 7;17(2):e0261914.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261914. eCollection 2022.

Confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modeling of the factor structure of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE)

Rapson Gomez  1 , Taylor Brown  2 , Shaun Watson  1 , Vasileios Stavropoulos  2
Affiliations

Confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modeling of the factor structure of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE)

Rapson Gomez et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE) is a multiple dimensional measure of cognitive empathy [comprising primary factors for perspective taking (PT), online simulation (OS)], and affective empathy [comprising primary factors for emotion contagion (EC), proximal responsivity (PRO), and peripheral responsivity (PER)]. This study used independent clusters confirmatory factor analysis (ICM-CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) to examine the scale's factor structure. A general community sample of 203 (men = 43, women = 160) between 17 and 63 years completed the QCAE. Although both the five-factor oblique and second order factor models showed good model fit, and clarity in the pattern of factor loadings, in the second-order factor model, none of the primary factors loaded significantly on their respective secondary factors, thereby favoring the five-factor oblique model. The factors in this model were supported in terms of external validity. Despite this, the factor for PRO in this model showed low reliability for meaning interpretation. A revised four-factor oblique model without the PRO factor showed good fit, clarity in the pattern of factor loadings, and reliability and validity for the factors in this model, thereby suggesting this to be the best model to represent ratings on the QCAE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The fourth author, Dr Vasileios Stavropoulos, is an associate editor for PLOS One. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

References

    1. Batson CD. These things called empathy: eight related but distinct phenomena. 2009.
    1. Hoffman ML. Empathic emotions and justice in society. Social Justice Research. 1989; 3(4):283–311.
    1. Leiberg S, Anders S. The multiple facets of empathy: a survey of theory and evidence. Progress in brain research. 2006; 156:419–40. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56023-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reniers RL, Corcoran R, Drake R, Shryane NM, Völlm BA. The QCAE: A questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy. Journal of personality assessment. 2011; 93(1):84–95. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.528484 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Di Girolamo M, Giromini L, Winters CL, Serie CM, de Ruiter C. The questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy: A comparison between paper-and-pencil versus online formats in Italian samples. Journal of personality assessment. 2019; 101(2):159–70. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1389745 - DOI - PubMed