Key drivers of fertility levels and differentials in India, at the national, state and population subgroup levels, 2015-2016: An application of Bongaarts' proximate determinants model
- PMID: 35130319
- PMCID: PMC8820640
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263532
Key drivers of fertility levels and differentials in India, at the national, state and population subgroup levels, 2015-2016: An application of Bongaarts' proximate determinants model
Abstract
Objectives: The transition to small family size is at an advanced phase in India, with a national TFR of 2.2 in 2015-16. This paper examines the roles of four key determinants of fertility-marriage, contraception, abortion and postpartum infecundability-for India, all 29 states and population subgroups.
Methods: Data from the most recent available national survey, the National Family Health Survey, conducted in 2015-16, were used. The Bongaarts proximate determinants model was used to quantify the roles of the four key factors that largely determine fertility. Methodological contributions of this analysis are: adaptations of the model to the Indian context; measurement of the role of abortion; and provision of estimates for sub-groups nationally and by state: age, education, residence, wealth status and caste.
Results: Nationally, marriage is the most important determinant of the reduction in fertility from the biological maximum, contributing 36%, followed by contraception and abortion, contributing 24% and 23% respectively, and post-partum infecundability contributed 16%. This national pattern of contributions characterizes most states and subgroups. Abortion makes a larger contribution than contraception among young women and better educated women. Findings suggest that sterility and infertility play a greater than average role in Southern states; marriage practices in some Northeastern states; and male migration for less-educated women. The absence of stronger relationships between the key proximate fertility determinants and geography or socio-economic status suggests that as family size declined, the role of these determinants is increasingly homogenous.
Conclusions: Findings argue for improvements across all states and subgroups, in provision of contraceptive care and safe abortion services, given the importance of these mechanisms for implementing fertility preferences. In-depth studies are needed to identify policy and program needs that depend on the barriers and vulnerabilities that exist in specific areas and population groups.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Determinants of fertility decline in China, 1981: analysis of intermediate variables.Soc Biol. 1992 Spring-Summer;39(1-2):15-26. doi: 10.1080/19485565.1992.9988801. Soc Biol. 1992. PMID: 1514118
-
The Proximate Determinants of Fertility in Eswatini.Afr J Reprod Health. 2019 Jun;23(2):65-75. doi: 10.29063/ajrh2019/v23i2.7. Afr J Reprod Health. 2019. PMID: 31433595
-
Fertility levels, trends, and differentials in sub-Saharan Africa in the 1980s and 1990s.Stud Fam Plann. 1998 Mar;29(1):1-22. Stud Fam Plann. 1998. PMID: 9561666
-
Contributions of the proximate determinants to fertility change in Botswana.J Biosoc Sci. 1996 Jul;28(3):325-38. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000022392. J Biosoc Sci. 1996. PMID: 8698712
-
Understanding U.S. fertility: continuity and change in the National Survey of Family Growth, 1988-1995.Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Jan-Feb;28(1):4-12. Fam Plann Perspect. 1996. PMID: 8822409 Review.
Cited by
-
Patterns in age at first marriage and its determinants in India: A historical perspective of last 30 years (1992-2021).SSM Popul Health. 2023 Feb 10;22:101363. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101363. eCollection 2023 Jun. SSM Popul Health. 2023. PMID: 36852378 Free PMC article.
-
Does unintended birth lead to zero dose of DPT vaccine among children aged 12-23 months in India?Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2417526. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2417526. Epub 2024 Nov 7. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024. PMID: 39506883 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on fertility behaviour in Indian states: Evidence from the National Family Health Survey (2019/21).PLoS One. 2024 Dec 6;19(12):e0314800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314800. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39642161 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Government of India. National Population Policy 2000 [Internet]. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW); 2000. Available from: https://nhm.gov.in/images/pdf/guidelines/nrhm-guidelines/national_popula...
-
- International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015–16: India. Mumbai: IIPS; 2017.
-
- Bongaarts J. The Fertility-Inhibiting Effects of the Intermediate Fertility Variables. Stud Fam Plann. 1982;13(6/7):179–89. - PubMed
-
- Davis K, Blake J. Social Structure and Fertility: An Analytic Framework. Econ Dev Cult Change. 1956;4(3):211–35.
-
- Bongaarts J. A Framework for Analyzing the Proximate Determinants of Fertility. Popul Dev Rev. 1978;4(1):105–32.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources