Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 7;17(2):e0263532.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263532. eCollection 2022.

Key drivers of fertility levels and differentials in India, at the national, state and population subgroup levels, 2015-2016: An application of Bongaarts' proximate determinants model

Affiliations

Key drivers of fertility levels and differentials in India, at the national, state and population subgroup levels, 2015-2016: An application of Bongaarts' proximate determinants model

Susheela Singh et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objectives: The transition to small family size is at an advanced phase in India, with a national TFR of 2.2 in 2015-16. This paper examines the roles of four key determinants of fertility-marriage, contraception, abortion and postpartum infecundability-for India, all 29 states and population subgroups.

Methods: Data from the most recent available national survey, the National Family Health Survey, conducted in 2015-16, were used. The Bongaarts proximate determinants model was used to quantify the roles of the four key factors that largely determine fertility. Methodological contributions of this analysis are: adaptations of the model to the Indian context; measurement of the role of abortion; and provision of estimates for sub-groups nationally and by state: age, education, residence, wealth status and caste.

Results: Nationally, marriage is the most important determinant of the reduction in fertility from the biological maximum, contributing 36%, followed by contraception and abortion, contributing 24% and 23% respectively, and post-partum infecundability contributed 16%. This national pattern of contributions characterizes most states and subgroups. Abortion makes a larger contribution than contraception among young women and better educated women. Findings suggest that sterility and infertility play a greater than average role in Southern states; marriage practices in some Northeastern states; and male migration for less-educated women. The absence of stronger relationships between the key proximate fertility determinants and geography or socio-economic status suggests that as family size declined, the role of these determinants is increasingly homogenous.

Conclusions: Findings argue for improvements across all states and subgroups, in provision of contraceptive care and safe abortion services, given the importance of these mechanisms for implementing fertility preferences. In-depth studies are needed to identify policy and program needs that depend on the barriers and vulnerabilities that exist in specific areas and population groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. A moderate positive correlation is observed between actual and estimated total fertility rates, India 2015–16.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Contraception and abortion are the leading fertility inhibiting factors among women above age 25, India, 2015–16.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Fertility inhibiting effect of marriage increases, while that of postpartum infecundability decreases with improvements in sociodemographic status, India, 2015–16.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Government of India. National Population Policy 2000 [Internet]. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW); 2000. Available from: https://nhm.gov.in/images/pdf/guidelines/nrhm-guidelines/national_popula...
    1. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015–16: India. Mumbai: IIPS; 2017.
    1. Bongaarts J. The Fertility-Inhibiting Effects of the Intermediate Fertility Variables. Stud Fam Plann. 1982;13(6/7):179–89. - PubMed
    1. Davis K, Blake J. Social Structure and Fertility: An Analytic Framework. Econ Dev Cult Change. 1956;4(3):211–35.
    1. Bongaarts J. A Framework for Analyzing the Proximate Determinants of Fertility. Popul Dev Rev. 1978;4(1):105–32.

Publication types

MeSH terms