Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Mar 1;40(10):1483-1492.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.12.046. Epub 2021 Dec 24.

Efficacy and safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in participants with a history of cancer: subgroup analysis of a global phase 3 randomized clinical trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Efficacy and safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in participants with a history of cancer: subgroup analysis of a global phase 3 randomized clinical trial

Stephen J Thomas et al. Vaccine. .

Abstract

Introduction: Individuals with an underlying malignancy have high risk of poor COVID-19 outcomes. In clinical trials, COVID-19 vaccines were safe and efficacious against infection, hospitalization, and death, but most trials excluded participants with cancer. We report results from participants with a history of past or active neoplasm (malignant or benign/unknown) and up to 6 months' follow-up post-dose 2 from the placebo-controlled, observer-blinded trial of the 2-dose BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.

Patients and methods: Between July 2020-January 2021, 46,429 participants aged ≥ 12 years were randomized at 152 sites in 6 countries. Healthy participants with pre-existing stable neoplasm could participate; those receiving immunosuppressive therapy were excluded. Data are reported for participants, aged ≥ 16 years for safety and ≥ 12 years for efficacy, who had any history of neoplasm at baseline (data cut-off: March 13, 2021). Adverse-event (AE) data are controlled for follow-up time before unblinding and reported as incidence rates (IRs) per 100 person-years follow-up.

Results: At baseline, 3813 participants had a history of neoplasm; most common malignancies were breast (n = 460), prostate (n = 362), and melanoma (n = 223). Four BNT162b2 and 71 placebo recipients developed COVID-19 from 7 days post-dose 2; vaccine efficacy was 94.4% (95% CI: 85.2, 98.5) after up to 6 months' follow-up post-dose 2. This compares favorably with vaccine efficacy of 91.1% in the overall trial population after the same follow-up. AEs were reported at IRs of 95.4(BNT162b2) and 48.3 (placebo) per 100 person-years. Most common AEs were reactogenicity events (injection-site pain, fatigue, pyrexia). Three BNT162b2 and 1 placebo recipients withdrew because of vaccine-related AEs. No vaccine-related deaths were reported.

Conclusion: In participants with past or active neoplasms, BNT162b2 vaccine has a similar efficacy and safety profile as in the overall trial population. These results can inform BNT162b2 use during the COVID-19 pandemic and future trials in participants with cancer. Clinical trial number: NCT04368728.

Keywords: BNT162b2; COVID-19; Efficacy; Malignancy; Safety; Vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest SJT: investigator on Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine trials, single consulting engagement and ad hoc advisory board member for Pfizer; JLP, SPL, SH, NK, RB, KL, XX, KK, SSD, CL, WCG: employees of Pfizer and hold Pfizer stock/stock options; EL, OT, US: employees of BioNTech; TG: nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mode of action of the BNT162b2 vaccine. APC = antigen presenting cell; LNP = lipid nanoparticles; mRNA = messenger ribonucleic acid; modRNA = modified ribonucleic acid; UTR = untranslated region.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Confirmed COVID-19 occurrence at least 7 days after the second vaccine dose among participants with A) any history of past or active neoplasm (malignancy or benign/unknown tumor) at baseline, and B) the overall trial population (evaluable efficacy population; participants with or without evidence of previous infection). CI = confidence interval; COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019; VE = vaccine efficacy.

References

    1. Kuderer N.M., Choueiri T.K., Shah D.P., Shyr Y.u., Rubinstein S.M., Rivera D.R., et al. Clinical impact of COVID-19 on patients with cancer (CCC19): a cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10241):1907–1918. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martín‐Moro F., Marquet J., Piris M., Michael B.M., Sáez A.J., Corona M., et al. Survival study of hospitalised patients with concurrent COVID-19 and haematological malignancies. Br J Haematol. 2020;190(1):e16–e20. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16801. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rüthrich M.M., Giessen-Jung C., Borgmann S., Classen A.Y., Dolff S., Grüner B., et al. COVID-19 in cancer patients: clinical characteristics and outcome-an analysis of the LEOSS registry. Ann Hematol. 2021;100(2):383–393. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Venkatesulu BP, Chandrasekar VT, Girdhar P, Advani P, Sharma A, Elumalai T, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of cancer patients affected by a novel coronavirus. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021;5(2):pkaa102. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee LYW, Cazier JB, Starkey T, Briggs SEW, Arnold R, Bisht V, et al. COVID-19 prevalence and mortality in patients with cancer and the effect of primary tumour subtype and patient demographics: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(10):1309-16. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data