Efficacy and safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in participants with a history of cancer: subgroup analysis of a global phase 3 randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 35131133
- PMCID: PMC8702495
- DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.12.046
Efficacy and safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in participants with a history of cancer: subgroup analysis of a global phase 3 randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Introduction: Individuals with an underlying malignancy have high risk of poor COVID-19 outcomes. In clinical trials, COVID-19 vaccines were safe and efficacious against infection, hospitalization, and death, but most trials excluded participants with cancer. We report results from participants with a history of past or active neoplasm (malignant or benign/unknown) and up to 6 months' follow-up post-dose 2 from the placebo-controlled, observer-blinded trial of the 2-dose BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.
Patients and methods: Between July 2020-January 2021, 46,429 participants aged ≥ 12 years were randomized at 152 sites in 6 countries. Healthy participants with pre-existing stable neoplasm could participate; those receiving immunosuppressive therapy were excluded. Data are reported for participants, aged ≥ 16 years for safety and ≥ 12 years for efficacy, who had any history of neoplasm at baseline (data cut-off: March 13, 2021). Adverse-event (AE) data are controlled for follow-up time before unblinding and reported as incidence rates (IRs) per 100 person-years follow-up.
Results: At baseline, 3813 participants had a history of neoplasm; most common malignancies were breast (n = 460), prostate (n = 362), and melanoma (n = 223). Four BNT162b2 and 71 placebo recipients developed COVID-19 from 7 days post-dose 2; vaccine efficacy was 94.4% (95% CI: 85.2, 98.5) after up to 6 months' follow-up post-dose 2. This compares favorably with vaccine efficacy of 91.1% in the overall trial population after the same follow-up. AEs were reported at IRs of 95.4(BNT162b2) and 48.3 (placebo) per 100 person-years. Most common AEs were reactogenicity events (injection-site pain, fatigue, pyrexia). Three BNT162b2 and 1 placebo recipients withdrew because of vaccine-related AEs. No vaccine-related deaths were reported.
Conclusion: In participants with past or active neoplasms, BNT162b2 vaccine has a similar efficacy and safety profile as in the overall trial population. These results can inform BNT162b2 use during the COVID-19 pandemic and future trials in participants with cancer. Clinical trial number: NCT04368728.
Keywords: BNT162b2; COVID-19; Efficacy; Malignancy; Safety; Vaccine.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest SJT: investigator on Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine trials, single consulting engagement and ad hoc advisory board member for Pfizer; JLP, SPL, SH, NK, RB, KL, XX, KK, SSD, CL, WCG: employees of Pfizer and hold Pfizer stock/stock options; EL, OT, US: employees of BioNTech; TG: nothing to disclose.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577. Epub 2020 Dec 10. N Engl J Med. 2020. PMID: 33301246 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months.N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 4;385(19):1761-1773. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2110345. Epub 2021 Sep 15. N Engl J Med. 2021. PMID: 34525277 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of the CVnCoV SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine candidate in ten countries in Europe and Latin America (HERALD): a randomised, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2b/3 trial.Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Mar;22(3):329-340. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00677-0. Epub 2021 Nov 23. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 34826381 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The dawn of mRNA vaccines: The COVID-19 case.J Control Release. 2021 May 10;333:511-520. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.03.043. Epub 2021 Mar 30. J Control Release. 2021. PMID: 33798667 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Co-Administration of BNT162b2 COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccines in Adults: A Global Systematic Review.Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Apr 2;13(4):381. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13040381. Vaccines (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40333241 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
COVID-19 Sequelae and the Host Proinflammatory Response: An Analysis From the OnCovid Registry.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Jul 11;114(7):979-987. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac057. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022. PMID: 35417006 Free PMC article.
-
Updated International Society of Geriatric Oncology COVID-19 working group recommendations on COVID-19 vaccination among older adults with cancer.J Geriatr Oncol. 2022 Sep;13(7):1054-1057. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.07.005. Epub 2022 Jul 15. J Geriatr Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35853816 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Cancer Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Study From a Najran Oncology Center.Cureus. 2024 Jun 26;16(6):e63252. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63252. eCollection 2024 Jun. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39070488 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer Patients during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mini-Review.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 13;11(2):248. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11020248. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36673615 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical efficacy of the first two doses of anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in solid cancer patients.Cancer Med. 2023 Jun;12(12):12967-12974. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5968. Epub 2023 Apr 28. Cancer Med. 2023. PMID: 37114577 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous