Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Feb 7;12(2):e054164.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054164.

Estimating maternity ward birth attendant time use in India: a microcosting study

Katherine T Lofgren  1 , Lauren Bobanski  2 , Danielle E Tuller  2 , Vinay P Singh  3   4 , Megan Marx Delaney  2 , Amanda Jurczak  2 , Meera Ragavan  5 , Tapan Kalita  6 , Ami Karlage  2 , Stephen Charles Resch  7 , Katherine E A Semrau  2   8   9
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Estimating maternity ward birth attendant time use in India: a microcosting study

Katherine T Lofgren et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Despite global concern over the quality of maternal care, little is known about the time requirements to complete the essential birth practices. Using three microcosting data collection methods within the BetterBirth trial, we aimed to assess time use and the specific time requirements to incorporate the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist into clinical practice.

Setting: We collected detailed survey data on birth attendant time use within the BetterBirth trial in Uttar Pradesh, India. The BetterBirth trial tested whether the peer-coaching-based implementation of the WHO Checklist was effective in improving the quality of facility-based childbirth care.

Participants: We collected measurements of time to completion for 18 essential birth practices from July 2016 through October 2016 across 10 facilities in five districts (1559 total timed observations). An anonymous survey asked about the impact of the WHO Checklist on birth attendants at every intervention facility (15 facilities, 83 respondents) in the Lucknow hub. Additionally, data collectors visited facilities to conduct a census of patients and birth attendants across 20 facilities in seven districts between June 2016 and November 2016 (six hundred and ten 2-hour facility observations).

Primary and secondary outcome measures: The primary outcome measure of this study is the per cent of staff time required to complete the essential birth practices included in the WHO Checklist.

Results: When birth attendants were timed, we found practices were completed rapidly (18 s to 2 min). As the patient load increased, time dedicated to clinical care increased but remained low relative to administrative and downtime. On average, WHO Checklist clinical care accounted for less than 7% of birth attendant time use per hour.

Conclusions: We did not find that a coaching-based implementation of the WHO Checklist was a burden on birth attendant's time use. However, questions remain regarding the performance quality of practices and how to accurately capture and interpret idle and break time.

Trial registration number: NCT02148952.

Keywords: health economics; maternal medicine; quality in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Time-to-complete specific Checklist-related tasks. Tasks with two or fewer observations have been excluded from this graph. The underlying data for this graph is available in online supplemental table A6.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Birth attendant tasks stratified by patient load per provider. Coloured bar regions represent the IQR.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Per cent of facility staff hours recorded as downtime by patient load per birth attendant.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hogan DR, Stevens GA, Hosseinpoor AR, et al. . Monitoring universal health coverage within the sustainable development goals: development and baseline data for an index of essential health services. Lancet Glob Health 2018;6:e152–68. 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30472-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lozano R, Wang H, Foreman KJ, et al. . Progress towards millennium development goals 4 and 5 on maternal and child mortality: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet 2011;378:1139–65. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61337-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. United Nations Millennium Development Goals [Internet]. Available: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/maternal.shtml [Accessed Sep 2018].
    1. Ng M, Misra A, Diwan V, et al. . An assessment of the impact of the JSY cash transfer program on maternal mortality reduction in Madhya Pradesh, India. Glob Health Action 2014;7:24939. 10.3402/gha.v7.24939 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Okeke EN, Chari AV. Can institutional deliveries reduce newborn mortality? Evidence from Rwanda. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2015. https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR1072.html

Publication types

Associated data