Tobacco-related risk perceptions, social influences and public smoke-free policies in relation to smoke-free home restrictions: findings from a baseline cross-sectional survey of Armenian and Georgian adults in a community randomised trial
- PMID: 35131832
- PMCID: PMC8823221
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055396
Tobacco-related risk perceptions, social influences and public smoke-free policies in relation to smoke-free home restrictions: findings from a baseline cross-sectional survey of Armenian and Georgian adults in a community randomised trial
Abstract
Objectives: Given high prevalence of smoking and secondhand smoke exposure in Armenia and Georgia and quicker implementation of tobacco legislation in Georgia versus Armenia, we examined correlates of having no/partial versus complete smoke-free home (SFH) restrictions across countries, particularly smoking characteristics, risk perceptions, social influences and public smoking restrictions.
Design: Cross-sectional survey study design.
Setting: 28 communities in Armenia and Georgia surveyed in 2018.
Participants: 1456 adults ages 18-64 in Armenia (n=705) and Georgia (n=751).
Measurements: We used binary logistic regression to examine aforementioned correlates of no/partial versus complete SFH among non-smokers and smokers in Armenia and Georgia, respectively.
Results: Participants were an average age of 43.35, 60.5% women and 27.3% smokers. In Armenia, among non-smokers, having no/partial SFHs correlated with being men (OR=2.63, p=0.001) and having more friend smokers (OR=1.23, p=0.002); among smokers, having no/partial SFHs correlated with being unmarried (OR=10.00, p=0.001), lower quitting importance (OR=0.82, p=0.010) and less favourable smoking attitudes among friends/family/public (OR=0.48, p=0.034). In Georgia, among non-smokers, having no/partial SFHs correlated with older age (OR=1.04, p=0.002), being men (OR=5.56, p<0.001), lower SHS risk perception (OR=0.43, p<0.001), more friend smokers (OR=1.49, p=0.002) and fewer workplace (indoor) restrictions (OR=0.51, p=0.026); among smokers, having no/partial SFHs correlated with being men (OR=50.00, p<0.001), without children (OR=5.88, p<0.001), daily smoking (OR=4.30, p=0.050), lower quitting confidence (OR=0.81, p=0.004), more friend smokers (OR=1.62, p=0.038) and fewer community restrictions (OR=0.68, p=0.026).
Conclusions: Private settings continue to lack smoking restrictions in Armenia and Georgia. Findings highlight the importance of social influences and comprehensive tobacco legislation, particularly smoke-free policies, in changing household smoking restrictions and behaviours.
Trial registration number: NCT03447912.
Keywords: epidemiology; health policy; public health.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
References
-
- World Health Organization . MPOWER: offer help to quit tobacco use, 2019. Available: http://www.who.int/tobacco/mpower/offer/en/
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Secondhand smoke | CDC. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_information/secondhand_smoke/index.htm [Accessed 13 Apr 2021].
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Secondhand Smoke (SHS) Facts | Smoking & Tobacco Use | CDC. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/secondhand_smoke... [Accessed 13 Apr 2021].
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Smokefree policies reduce Secondhand smoke exposure | CDC. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/secondhand_smoke... [Accessed 13 Apr 2021].
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical