Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 15;128 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):883-891.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.33954.

Development and evaluation of safety and effectiveness of novel cancer screening tests for routine clinical use with applications to multicancer detection technologies

Affiliations

Development and evaluation of safety and effectiveness of novel cancer screening tests for routine clinical use with applications to multicancer detection technologies

Chyke A Doubeni et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Multicancer screening is a promising approach to improving the detection of preclinical disease, but current technologies have limited ability to identify precursor or early stage lesions, and approaches for developing the evidentiary chain are unclear. Frameworks to enable development and evaluation from discovery through evidence of clinical effectiveness are discussed.

Keywords: cancer screening; clinical reference standard; clinical utility; diagnostic test accuracy; lead time bias; multicancer early detection; multicancer screening; standard of care screening test; test development framework; tumor of origin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Chyke A. Doubeni reports research grants from the National Cancer Institute, honoraria from UpToDate for author topics, service on the NRG Oncology Data Safety Monitoring Board, and membership on the US Preventive Services Task Force outside the submitted work. Jennifer S. Lin has worked with the US Preventive Services Task Force, the American College of Physicians’ Clinical Guideline Committee, and the Kaiser Permanente National Guidelines Committee, none of which currently recommend multicancer screening tests. Yan Kwan Lau, Gene A. Pennello, and Robert W. Carlson made no disclosures.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Novel cancer test development and framework are illustrated. Note that, for some tests, clinical utility may be inferred and thus enable implementation without obtaining primary evidence on effectiveness from prospective comparative studies with mortality outcome. Adapted from: Pepe et al, 2001; CanTest (Walter et al, 2019); and the analytic validity, clinical validity, clinical utility, and ethical (ACCE) frameworks (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2020).

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wilson JMG, Jungner G, World Health Organization. Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. Public Health Papers No. 34. World Health Organization; 1968.
    1. US Preventive Services Task Force, Davidson KW, Barry MJ, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2021;325:1965–1977. - PubMed
    1. US Preventive Services Task Force, Curry SJ, Krist AH, et al. Screening for cervical cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2018;320:674–686. - PubMed
    1. Siu AL, US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164:279–296. - PubMed
    1. Moyer VA, US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for lung cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:330–338. - PubMed

Publication types