Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 May 10;40(14):1552-1561.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01648. Epub 2022 Feb 8.

Phase II Study of Copanlisib in Patients With Tumors With PIK3CA Mutations: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol Z1F

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Phase II Study of Copanlisib in Patients With Tumors With PIK3CA Mutations: Results From the NCI-MATCH ECOG-ACRIN Trial (EAY131) Subprotocol Z1F

Senthil Damodaran et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Activating mutations in PIK3CA are observed across multiple tumor types. The NCI-MATCH (EAY131) is a tumor-agnostic platform trial that enrolls patients to targeted therapies on the basis of matching genomic alterations. Arm Z1F evaluated copanlisib, an α and δ isoform-specific phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, in patients with PIK3CA mutations (with or without PTEN loss).

Patients and methods: Patients received copanlisib (60 mg intravenous) once weekly on days 1, 8, and 15 in 28-day cycles until progression or toxicity. Patients with KRAS mutations, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancers, and lymphomas were excluded. The primary end point was centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR); secondary end points included progression-free survival, 6-month progression-free survival, and overall survival.

Results: Thirty-five patients were enrolled, and 25 patients were included in the primary efficacy analysis as prespecified in the Protocol. Multiple histologies were enrolled, with gynecologic (n = 6) and gastrointestinal (n = 6) being the most common. Sixty-eight percent of patients had ≥ 3 lines of prior therapy. The ORR was 16% (4 of 25, 90% CI, 6 to 33) with P = .0341 against a null rate of 5%. The most common reason for protocol discontinuation was disease progression (n = 17, 68%). Grade 3/4 toxicities observed were consistent with reported toxicities for PI3K pathway inhibition. Sixteen patients (53%) had grade 3 toxicities, and one patient (3%) had grade 4 toxicity (CTCAE v5.0). Most common toxicities include hyperglycemia (n = 19), fatigue (n = 12), diarrhea (n = 11), hypertension (n = 10), and nausea (n = 10).

Conclusion: The study met its primary end point with an ORR of 16% (P = .0341) with copanlisib showing clinical activity in select tumors with PIK3CA mutation in the refractory setting.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02465060.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Senthil DamodaranResearch Funding: EMD Serono (Inst), Guardant Health (Inst), Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Sermonix Pharmaceuticals (Inst) Fengmin ZhaoThis author is a member of the Journal of Clinical Oncology Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript. Dustin A. DemingConsulting or Advisory Role: Bayer, Promega, Array BioPharma, Lilly, PfizerResearch Funding: Merck (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Genentech (Inst), Revolution Medicines (Inst), Millennium (Inst), Bayer Edith P. MitchellLeadership: Corvus PharmaceuticalsHonoraria: Sanofi, ExelixisConsulting or Advisory Role: Genentech, Novartis, Merck, Bristol Myers SquibSpeakers' Bureau: IpsenResearch Funding: Genentech (Inst), sanofi (Inst) Robert J. GrayResearch Funding: Agios, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Genentech/Roche, Genomic Health, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Ortho, Onyx, Pfizer, Sequenta, Syndax, Novartis, Takeda, AbbVie, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dohme Lisa M. McShaneThis author is a member of the Journal of Clinical Oncology Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript. Larry V. RubinsteinThis author is a member of the Journal of Clinical Oncology Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript. P. Mickey WilliamsResearch Funding: Illumina (Inst)Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: I was a coinventor of the DLBCL cell of origin patent recently filed by the NIH Stanley R. HamiltonResearch Funding: Minerva Biotechnologies, Intima Carlos L. ArteagaStock and Other Ownership Interests: Provista DiagnosticsConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Lilly, Sanofi, Radius Health, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Puma Biotechnology, Merck, Origimed, Immunomedics, Daiichi Sankyo, Athenex, Astrazeneca, ArvinasResearch Funding: Pfizer, Lilly, TakedaOther Relationship: Susan G. Komen for the Cure Lyndsay N. HarrisPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Philips Healthcare Peter J. O'DwyerConsulting or Advisory Role: GenentechResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Genentech (Inst), Mirati Therapeutics (Inst), Celgene (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), BBI Healthcare (Inst), Pharmacyclics (Inst), Five Prime Therapeutics (Inst), Forty Seven (Inst), Amgen (Inst), H3 Biomedicine (Inst), Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst), Array BioPharma (Inst), Lilly/ImClone (Inst), Syndax (Inst), Minneamrita Therapeutics (Inst)Expert Testimony: Lilly, Dai-ichi Sankyo Alice P. ChenUncompensated Relationships: Frontiers in Medicine Keith T. FlahertyStock and Other Ownership Interests: Clovis Oncology, Loxo, X4 Pharma, Strata Oncology, PIC Therapeutics, Shattuck Labs, Apricity Health, Oncoceutics, FOGPharma, Tvardi Therapeutics, Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, Kinnate Biopharma, Scorpion Therapeutics, ALX Oncology, xCures, Monopteros Therapeutics, Vibliome Therapeutics, Transcode Therapeutics, Soley TherapeuticsConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, Lilly, Oncoceutics, Tvardi Therapeutics, Takeda, Boston Biomedical, Debiopharm Group, FOGPharmaNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Flowchart. Out of 35 enrolled patients, five patients did not start therapy. Among 30 that began treatment, 28 were considered evaluable for response (one patient had pretreatment creatinine clearance outside of eligibility range and the other had baseline AE greater than threshold for eligibility). Twenty-five patients were included in the primary efficacy analysis (three patients were excluded as mutational status was unable to be confirmed by the central assay). AE, adverse event; CrCl, creatinine clearance; NCI, National Cancer Institute.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
(A) Distributions of PIK3CA mutations across helical and kinase domains. (B) Distribution of specific variants in PIK3CA.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Best percentage change from baseline. Of the 25 patients included in the primary efficacy analysis, 22 patients had lesions measurable after baseline and are included. Four patients had PR. GU, genitourinary; Gyn, gynecologic; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.
FIG 4.
FIG 4.
Duration of treatment. Twenty-five patients included in the primary efficacy analysis are shown here. Occurrence of response (*); disease progression (+); and death (#). Two patients are still on study treatment. GU, genitourinary; Gyn, gynecologic.
FIG 5.
FIG 5.
(A) PFS and (B) OS. OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.
FIG A1.
FIG A1.
Distributions of comutations in patients with PIK3CA mutations.
FIG A2.
FIG A2.
Best percentage change from baseline in patient cohort (n = 28). Of the 28 evaluable patients, 24 had lesions measurable after baseline and are included (one patient without target lesion at baseline, and three patients without target lesion at baseline and without any follow-up imaging assessments were not included). GU, genitourinary; Gyn, gynecologic; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.
FIG A3.
FIG A3.
Duration of treatment in patient cohort (n = 28). Occurrence of response (*); disease progression (+); and death (#). Two patients are still on study treatment. GU, genitourinary; Gyn, gynecologic.
FIG A4.
FIG A4.
(A) PFS and (B) OS for 28 patients (eligible and treated). OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.

References

    1. Engelman JA, Chen L, Tan X, et al. : Effective use of PI3K and MEK inhibitors to treat mutant Kras G12D and PIK3CA H1047R murine lung cancers. Nat Med 14:1351-1356, 2008 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Samuels Y, Wang Z, Bardelli A, et al. : High frequency of mutations of the PIK3CA gene in human cancers. Science 304:554, 2004 - PubMed
    1. Janku F, Tsimberidou AM, Garrido-Laguna I, et al. : PIK3CA mutations in patients with advanced cancers treated with PI3K/AKT/mTOR axis inhibitors. Mol Cancer Ther 10:558-565, 2011 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andre F, Ciruelos E, Rubovszky G, et al. : Alpelisib for PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 380:1929-1940, 2019 - PubMed
    1. Janku F, Hong DS, Fu S, et al. : Assessing PIK3CA and PTEN in early-phase trials with PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors. Cell Rep 6:377-387, 2014 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data