Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;37(23-24):NP22704-NP22731.
doi: 10.1177/08862605211072179. Epub 2022 Feb 8.

Determinants of Emotional Intimate Partner Violence against Women and Girls with Children in Mexican Households: An Ecological Framework

Affiliations

Determinants of Emotional Intimate Partner Violence against Women and Girls with Children in Mexican Households: An Ecological Framework

Juan Armando Torres Munguía et al. J Interpers Violence. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to identify the risk factors for emotional intimate partner violence (IPV) against women and girls with children in Mexico from an ecological perspective. To that end, we generate a dataset with 35,004 observations and 42 covariates, to which we apply an additive probit model estimated with a boosting algorithm to overcome high-dimensionality and simultaneously perform variable selection and model choice. The dataset integrates 10 information sources, allowing us to properly characterize the four levels of the ecological approach, which is the first contribution of this paper. In addition, there are three key contributions. First, we identify a number of factors significantly linked to emotional IPV against women with children: age, age at sexual initiation, age at marriage (or cohabitation), autonomy regarding professional issues, social support networks, division of housework, the community's Gini index, women's economic participation in the municipality, and the prevalence of crime against males in the region. Second, we discuss some risk factors whose effects have not been examined or have been underexplored for Mexico; these include women's decision-making autonomy, social support networks, distribution of housework, the community's economic inequality, and criminality. Third, we identify specific risk subgroups that are generally overlooked: women who had their first sexual intercourse during childhood and women who got married (or moved in together with a partner) late in life. The main results suggest that strategies aiming to promote women's social and economic empowerment and reduce criminality should also incorporate a gender component regarding emotional violence against women with children in the context of intimate relationships.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Effects of selected continuous emotional IPV covariates at the individual level. a) Emotional IPV risk and women’s age, b) Emotional IPV risk and women’s age at first sexual intercourse by consent. Note. IPV=Intimate Partner Violence.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Effects of selected continuous emotional intimate partner violence covariates at the relationship level.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Effects of selected continuous emotional IPV covariates at the community level. a) Emotional IPV victimization risk and community’s Gini index, b) Emotional IPV victimization risk and community’s economically active female population. Note. IPV=Intimate Partner Violence.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Effects of selected continuous emotional intimate partner violence covariates at the societal level.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abramsky T., Lees S., Stöckl H., Harvey S., Kapinga I., Ranganathan M., Mshana G., Kapiga S. (2019). Women's income and risk of intimate partner violence: Secondary findings from the MAISHA cluster randomised trial in North-Western Tanzania. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 1108. 10.1186/s12889-019-7454-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ackerson L. K., Subramanian S. V. (2008). State gender inequality, Socioeconomic Status and Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) in India: A multilevel analysis. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 43(1), 81–102. 10.1002/j.1839-4655.2008.tb00091.x - DOI
    1. Ahmadabadi Z., Najman J. M., Williams G. M., Clavarino A. M. (2020). Income, gender, and forms of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(23–24), 5500–5525. 10.1177/0886260517719541 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alvarado-Zaldívar G., Moysén J. S., Estrada-Martínez S., Terrones-González A. (1998). Prevalencia de violencia doméstica en la ciudad de Durango. Salud Pública de México, 40(6), 481–486. 10.1590/S0036-36341998000600004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Avila-Burgos L., Valdez-Santiago R., Híjar M., Del Rio-Zolezzi A., Rojas-Martínez R., Medina-Solís C. E. (2009). Factors associated with severity of intimate partner abuse in Mexico: Results of the first National survey of violence against women. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 100(6), 436–441. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41995320 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types