Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb 8;23(1):128.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05081-7.

Preoperative management and postoperative complications associated with transoral decompression for the upper cervical spine

Wenqiang Li #  1 , Bingjin Wang #  1 , Xiaobo Feng  1 , Wenbin Hua  1 , Cao Yang  2
Affiliations
Review

Preoperative management and postoperative complications associated with transoral decompression for the upper cervical spine

Wenqiang Li et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Purpose: This review aimed to describe the preoperative management and postoperative complications associated with transoral decompression of the upper cervical spine, and to clarify the risk factors, related issues and complication management.

Methods: Studies on transoral decompression for the upper cervical spine were reviewed systematically. The preoperative management and postoperative complications associated with transoral decompression for upper cervical deformities were analyzed.

Results: Evidence suggests that preoperative management in patients undergoing transoral decompression for the upper cervical spine is closely related to the occurrence of postoperative complications. Hence, preoperative surgical planning, preoperative preparation, and oral nursing care should be seriously considered in these patients. Moreover, while being established as an effective and safe method, transoral decompression is associated with several postoperative complications, which could be prevented by elaborate preoperative management, improved surgical skills, and appropriate precautionary measures.

Conclusions: The effectiveness and safety of transoral decompression has been improved by the constant development of operative techniques and advanced auxiliary diagnostic and therapeutic methods, with the understanding of the anatomical structure of the craniocervical joint. Therefore, the incidence rates of postoperative complications have decreased. The application of individualized anterior implants and less-invasive endoscopic endonasal approach has improved the effectiveness of transoral decompression and reduced the associated complications.

Keywords: Complications; Preoperative management; Transoral decompression; Upper cervical spine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The preoperative management and the postoperative complications of transoral approach for the upper cervical deformities. Oral nursing care helps to reduce the occurrence of oropharyngeal complications, oral wound infection and dehiscence, as well as the occurrence of systemic complications such as pneumonia. Preoperative surgical planning and preoperative preparation play a role in reducing the occurrence of other complications
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A 55-year-old woman presented with numbness and weakness of limbs and was diagnosis with basilar invagination. A and B: Preoperative sagittal T1-weighted and T2-weighted MR images show intraspinal tumor in the upper cervical spine. C and D: Preoperative sagittal CT scan and CT angiography of the upper cervical spine. E: Intraoperative fluoroscopy with locating pin. F: Intraoperative tumor exposure after spinal durotomy. G: Duraplasty after tumor excision. H: Posterior fusion and stabilization. I and J: Postoperative sagittal T1-weighted and T2-weighted MR images show that intraspinal tumor was resected and the spinal cord was sufficient decompressed. K and L: Sagittal T1-weighted and T2-weighted MR images at a follow-up of 3 months postoperatively and the patient could walk well after the operation
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Amelot A, Terrier LM, Lot G. Craniovertebral junction Transoral approach: predictive factors of complications. World Neurosurg. 2018;110:568–574. - PubMed
    1. Perrini P, Benedetto N, Di Lorenzo N. Transoral approach to extradural non-neoplastic lesions of the craniovertebral junction. Acta Neurochir. 2014;156(6):1231–1236. - PubMed
    1. Kotil K, Kalayci M, Bilge T. Management of cervicomedullary compression in patients with congenital and acquired osseous-ligamentous pathologies. J Clin Neurosci. 2007;14(6):540–549. - PubMed
    1. Sar C, Eralp L. Transoral resection and reconstruction for primary osteogenic sarcoma of the second cervical vertebra. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26(17):1936–1941. - PubMed
    1. Shaha AR, Johnson R, Miller J, Milhorat T. Transoral-transpharyngeal approach to the upper cervical vertebrae. Am J Surg. 1993;166(4):336–340. - PubMed

MeSH terms