Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 8;10(1):E90-E99.
doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210243. Print 2022 Jan-Mar.

The CCEDRRN COVID-19 Mortality Score to predict death among nonpalliative patients with COVID-19 presenting to emergency departments: a derivation and validation study

Affiliations

The CCEDRRN COVID-19 Mortality Score to predict death among nonpalliative patients with COVID-19 presenting to emergency departments: a derivation and validation study

Corinne M Hohl et al. CMAJ Open. .

Abstract

Background: Predicting mortality from COVID-19 using information available when patients present to the emergency department can inform goals-of-care decisions and assist with ethical allocation of critical care resources. The study objective was to develop and validate a clinical score to predict emergency department and in-hospital mortality among consecutive nonpalliative patients with COVID-19; in this study, we define palliative patients as those who do not want resuscitative measures, such as intubation, intensive care unit care or cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Methods: This derivation and validation study used observational cohort data recruited from 46 hospitals in 8 Canadian provinces participating in the Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN). We included adult (age ≥ 18 yr) nonpalliative patients with confirmed COVID-19 who presented to the emergency department of a participating site between Mar. 1, 2020, and Jan. 31, 2021. We randomly assigned hospitals to derivation or validation, and prespecified clinical variables as candidate predictors. We used logistic regression to develop the score in a derivation cohort and examined its performance in predicting emergency department and in-hospital mortality in a validation cohort.

Results: Of 8761 eligible patients, 618 (7.0%) died. The CCEDRRN COVID-19 Mortality Score included age, sex, type of residence, arrival mode, chest pain, severe liver disease, respiratory rate and level of respiratory support. The area under the curve was 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-0.93) in derivation and 0.92 (95% CI 0.90-0.93) in validation. The score had excellent calibration. These results suggest that scores of 6 or less would categorize patients as being at low risk for in-hospital death, with a negative predictive value of 99.9%. Patients in the low-risk group had an in-hospital mortality rate of 0.1%. Patients with a score of 15 or higher had an observed mortality rate of 81.0%.

Interpretation: The CCEDRRN COVID-19 Mortality Score is a simple score that can be used for level-of-care discussions with patients and in situations of critical care resource constraints to accurately predict death using variables available on emergency department arrival. The score was derived and validated mostly in unvaccinated patients, and before variants of concern were circulating widely and newer treatment regimens implemented in Canada.

Study registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT04702945.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Flow diagram showing included and excluded emergency department (ED) visits. *Numbers total more than 8761 because 51 patients made visits to multiple EDs, some of which were derivation EDs and some of which were validation EDs.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Distribution and performance of the CCEDRRN COVID-19 Mortality Score in the validation cohort (left panel) and combined derivation and validation cohorts (right panel): (A) distribution of the score, (B) observed in-hospital mortality rates across the range of the score, (C) predicted versus observed risk of in-hospital death (dashed line represents line of no difference between predicted and observed risk) and (D) receiver-operating characteristic curve with area under the curve and associated 95% confidence interval.

References

    1. Tan E, Song J, Deane AM, et al. Global impact of coronavirus disease 2019 infection requiring admission to the ICU: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest. 2021;159:524–36. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenbaum L. Facing COVID-19 in Italy: ethics, logistics, and therapeutics on the epidemic’s front line. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1873–5. - PubMed
    1. Satomi E, Souza PMR, Thomé BDC, et al. Fair allocation of scarce medical resources during COVID-19 pandemic: ethical considerations. Einstein (Sao Paulo) 2020;18:eAE5775. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arya A, Buchman S, Gagnon B, et al. Pandemic palliative care: beyond ventilators and saving lives. CMAJ. 2020;192:E400–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maves RC, Downar J, Dichter JR, et al. ACCP Task Force for Mass Critical Care. Triage of scarce critical care resources in COVID-19 an implementation guide for regional allocation: an expert panel report of the Task Force for Mass Critical Care and the American College of Chest Physicians. Chest. 2020;158:212–25. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data