A Structured Review of Commercially Available Cardiac Rehabilitation mHealth Applications Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale
- PMID: 35135963
- PMCID: PMC11086945
- DOI: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000667
A Structured Review of Commercially Available Cardiac Rehabilitation mHealth Applications Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale
Abstract
Purpose: This study systematically evaluated the quality and functionalities of patient-facing, commercially available mobile health (mHealth) apps for cardiac rehabilitation (CR).
Methods: We performed our search in two of the most widely used commercial mobile app stores: Apple iTunes Appstore and Google Play Store (Android apps). Six search terms were used to query relevant CR apps: "cardiac rehabilitation," "heart disease and remote therapy," "heart failure exercise," "heart therapy and cardiac recovery," "cardiac recovery," and "heart therapy." App quality was evaluated using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS). App functionality was evaluated using the IQVIA functionality scale, and app content was evaluated against the American Heart Association guidelines for CR. Apps meeting our inclusion criteria were downloaded and evaluated by two to three reviewers, and interclass correlations between reviewers were calculated.
Results: We reviewed 3121 apps and nine apps met our inclusion criteria. On average, the apps scored a 3.0 on the MARS (5-point Likert scale) for overall quality. The two top-ranking mHealth apps for CR for all three quality, functionality, and consistency with evidence-based guidelines were My Cardiac Coach and Love My Heart for Women, both of which scored ≥4.0 for behavior change.
Conclusion: Overall, the quality and functionality of free apps for mobile CR was high, with two apps performing the best across all three quality categories. High-quality CR apps are available that can expand access to CR for patients with cardiovascular disease.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Mobile health applications for epilepsy in Indian app stores: A systematic review and content analysis using the mobile app rating scale.Epilepsy Res. 2024 Mar;201:107331. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107331. Epub 2024 Feb 22. Epilepsy Res. 2024. PMID: 38442549
-
Analysis of Apps With a Medication List Functionality for Older Adults With Heart Failure Using the Mobile App Rating Scale and the IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics Functionality Score: Evaluation Study.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 2;9(11):e30674. doi: 10.2196/30674. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021. PMID: 34726613 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Monitoring Symptoms of COVID-19: Review of Mobile Apps.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jun 1;10(6):e36065. doi: 10.2196/36065. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022. PMID: 35609313 Free PMC article.
-
Functionality and Quality of Asthma mHealth Apps and Their Consistency With International Guidelines: Structured Search and Evaluation.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jan 10;12:e47295. doi: 10.2196/47295. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024. PMID: 38198204 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Review and Analysis of German Mobile Apps for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Management Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 May 3;10(5):e31102. doi: 10.2196/31102. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022. PMID: 35503246 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Promoting patient self-management following cardiac rehabilitation using a web-based application: A pilot study.Digit Health. 2023 Nov 8;9:20552076231211546. doi: 10.1177/20552076231211546. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2023. PMID: 37954686 Free PMC article.
-
Can Lp(a) become the next A1C? A case for digital health management tools to overcome inertia to Lipoprotein (a) testing.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Feb 10;12:1545787. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1545787. eCollection 2025. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025. PMID: 39995970 Free PMC article.
-
Digital health intervention in patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation: systematic review and meta-analysis.F1000Res. 2024 Jun 7;13:596. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.152315.1. eCollection 2024. F1000Res. 2024. PMID: 38984016 Free PMC article.
-
Digital Apps to Improve Mobility in Adults with Neurological Conditions: A Health App-Focused Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 30;12(9):929. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12090929. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38727486 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prescribing Mobile Health Applications.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Jun;17(6):e010654. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010654. Epub 2024 Mar 25. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024. PMID: 38525595 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Heart Disease Facts | cdc.gov. https://www.cdc.gov/heartdisease/facts.htm.
-
- Leon AS et al. Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity), in collaboration with the American association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation 2005;111, 369–376. - PubMed
-
- Suaya JA, Stason WB, Ades PA, Normand S-LT & Shepard DS Cardiac rehabilitation and survival in older coronary patients. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009;54, 25–33. - PubMed
-
- Cano de la Cuerda R, Alguacil Diego IM, Alonso Martín JJ, Molero Sánchez A. & Miangolarra Page JC Cardiac rehabilitation programs and health-related quality of life. State of the art. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2012;65, 72–79. - PubMed
-
- Anderson L. et al. Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease: Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016;67, 1–12 (2016). - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous