Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec 8;9(12):e1226.
doi: 10.1002/cti2.1226. eCollection 2020.

Therapeutic strategies to remodel immunologically cold tumors

Affiliations
Review

Therapeutic strategies to remodel immunologically cold tumors

Minyu Wang et al. Clin Transl Immunology. .

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) induce a durable response in a wide range of tumor types, but only a minority of patients outside these 'responsive' tumor types respond, with some totally resistant. The primary predictor of intrinsic immune resistance to ICIs is the complete or near-complete absence of lymphocytes from the tumor, so-called immunologically cold tumors. Here, we propose two broad approaches to convert 'cold' tumors into 'hot' tumors. The first is to induce immunogenic tumor cell death, through the use of oncolytic viruses or bacteria, conventional cancer therapies (e.g. chemotherapy or radiation therapy) or small molecule drugs. The second approach is to target the tumor microenvironment, and covers diverse options such as depleting immune suppressive cells; inhibiting transforming growth factor-beta; remodelling the tumor vasculature or hypoxic environment; strengthening the infiltration and activation of antigen-presenting cells and/or effector T cells in the tumor microenvironment with immune modulators; and enhancing immunogenicity through personalised cancer vaccines. Strategies that successfully modify cold tumors to overcome their resistance to ICIs represent mechanistically driven approaches that will ultimately result in rational combination therapies to extend the clinical benefits of immunotherapy to a broader cancer cohort.

Keywords: cancer immunotherapy; cold tumor; immune checkpoint inhibitor; immune surveillance and resistance; therapeutic strategy; tumor microenvironment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

PJN received research grants from Roche/Genentech, BMS, Allergan, Compugen and Juno/Celgene, outside the submitted work. JD reports research support from Roche Genentech, Lilly, Astra Zeneca, BeiGene, Novartis, Bristol‐Myers Squibb and GlaxoSmithKline, and consulting fees from Amgen, Eisai and Pierre‐Fabre. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Therapeutic strategies to remodel immunogenically cold tumors. (a) Features of an immunologically cold tumor. (b) Representative fluorescent images showing the cold and hot head and neck tumors with T infiltration visualised by CD3+ T cells (green) and a tumor marker (magenta). (c) Two therapeutic strategies that focus on inducing immunogenic tumor cell death and targeting the tumor microenvironment to convert ‘cold’ tumors into ‘hot’ ones. TGF‐β: Transforming growth factor‐beta.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The cancer immunity cycle and selective methods to increase tumor immunogenicity. Tumor antigens are released as cancer cells die and are captured by the antigen‐presenting dendritic cells in the tumor site, and further presented to T cells in the lymph node. T cells are activated and proliferate, and effector T cells traffic and infiltrate into the tumor site. Activated effector T cells recognise and kill the cancer cells. Oncolytic viruses/bacteria, conventional therapy and targeted therapies are able to induce immunogenic cell death. Personalised cancer vaccines typically comprise tumor‐associated antigens or tumor‐specific antigens in a vaccine vector (RNA, DNA, viral, bacteria, protein, peptide and antigen‐presenting cells) with an immune adjuvant. IFN, interferon; IL, interleukin; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; TCR, T‐cell receptor; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.

References

    1. Halse H, Colebatch AJ, Petrone P et al. Multiplex immunohistochemistry accurately defines the immune context of metastatic melanoma. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 11158. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang M, Huang YK, Kong JC et al. High‐dimensional analyses reveal a distinct role of T‐cell subsets in the immune microenvironment of gastric cancer. Clin Transl Immunology 2020; 9: e1127. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Galon J, Bruni D. Approaches to treat immune hot, altered and cold tumours with combination immunotherapies. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2019; 18: 197–218. - PubMed
    1. Trujillo JA, Sweis RF, Bao R, Luke JJ. T cell‐inflamed versus non‐T cell‐inflamed tumors: a conceptual framework for cancer immunotherapy drug development and combination therapy selection. Cancer Immunol Res 2018; 6: 990–1000. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zaretsky JM, Garcia‐Diaz A, Shin DS et al. Mutations associated with acquired resistance to PD‐1 blockade in melanoma. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 819–829. - PMC - PubMed