Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 31;37(1):e330.
doi: 10.5001/omj.2021.113. eCollection 2022 Jan.

Anaphylaxis in Omani Patients: A Study from a Tertiary Care Center

Affiliations

Anaphylaxis in Omani Patients: A Study from a Tertiary Care Center

Salem Al Tamemi et al. Oman Med J. .

Abstract

Objectives: Anaphylaxis is an acute and potentially fatal allergic reaction. No studies have yet been conducted to evaluate the spectrum of anaphylactic reactions among Omani patients. As such, this study aimed to describe the clinical features, causes, investigation, and management of anaphylaxis among patients presenting to a tertiary care center in Oman.

Methods: This retrospective study took place between August 2005 and June 2020 at the allergy and immunology clinic of Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman. All patients diagnosed with anaphylaxis during the study period were included. Data were collected from electronic medical records.

Results: One hundred patients were diagnosed with anaphylaxis during the study period. Of these, 52.0% were male. The mean age was 15.9±16.2 years, with 70.0% aged < 18 years old. The eosinophil count ranged from 0.0-16.9 × 109/L, with a mean of 0.8±2.2 × 109/L and a median of 0.3 (0.1-0.6) × 109/L. Total immunoglobulin (Ig) E levels ranged from 25-8706 kIU/L, with a mean of 935.1±1369.5 kIU/L and a median of 500.4 (186.0-972.5) kIU/L. The majority of patients had a family history of allergies (72.0%), and other had concomitant allergic conditions (66.0%). All were prescribed epinephrine (100%). The most common cause of anaphylaxis was food (65.0%). The second most frequent trigger was insect venom (32.0%). Most patients had one category cause (81.0%); two or more causes were present in 12.0% of patients. Clinical symptoms manifested most frequently as cutaneous (92.0%) and respiratory (85.0%). The majority of patients (87.0%) demonstrated the involvement of more than one bodily system. Mean total IgE levels were significantly higher in patients with concomitant presence of other allergic conditions (1193.8 kIU/L) than patients without another concomitant allergic disease (503.6 kIU/L; p =0.030). In addition, concomitant allergic disease is significantly higher in patients < 18 years of age (75.4%) compared to patients > 18 years of age (45.2%; p =0.010).

Conclusions: Due to its life-threatening nature, knowledge of the epidemiology and clinical features of anaphylaxis in different populations is necessary to deliver rapid treatment. This study found that the clinical features of anaphylactic patients in Oman were similar to those reported elsewhere. Further research is needed to determine the true incidence of anaphylaxis in Oman to minimize associated morbidity and mortality.

Keywords: Allergens; Anaphylaxis; Epinephrine; Immunoglobulin E; Retrospective Studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Systemic involvement according to clinical symptoms among Omani patients diagnosed with anaphylaxis (N = 100).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Anaphylactic causes or triggers identified among Omani patients diagnosed with anaphylaxis (N = 100).
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) The relationship between total immunoglobulin (Ig) E level and the number of identified allergic triggers among Omani patients diagnosed with anaphylaxis (N = 100). (b) The relationship between total IgE level and the presence of other allergic conditions such as eczema, asthma, and rhinitis in patients with anaphylaxis (N = 100).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yunginger JW, Sweeney KG, Sturner WQ, Giannandrea LA, Teigland JD, Bray M, et al. . Fatal food-induced anaphylaxis. JAMA 1988. Sep;260(10):1450-1452. 10.1001/jama.1988.03410100140041 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pouessel G, Claverie C, Labreuche J, Dorkenoo A, Renaudin JM, Eb M, et al. . Fatal anaphylaxis in France: Analysis of national anaphylaxis data, 1979-2011. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2017. Aug;140(2):610-612.e2. 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.02.014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sampson HA, Muñoz-Furlong A, Bock SA, Schmitt C, Bass R, Chowdhury BA, et al. . Symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005. Mar;115(3):584-591. 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.01.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Muraro A, Roberts G, Worm M, Bilò MB, Brockow K, Fernández Rivas M, et al. EAACI Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Guidelines Group . Anaphylaxis: guidelines from the European academy of allergy and clinical immunology. Allergy 2014. Aug;69(8):1026-1045. 10.1111/all.12437 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Simons FE. Anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010. Feb;125(2)(Suppl 2):S161-S181. 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.12.981 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources