Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Aug 24;75(1):e991-e999.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac102.

The International Sexual Health And REproductive Health during COVID-19 (I-SHARE) Study: A Multicountry Analysis of Adults from 30 Countries Prior to and During the Initial Coronavirus Disease 2019 Wave

Collaborators, Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The International Sexual Health And REproductive Health during COVID-19 (I-SHARE) Study: A Multicountry Analysis of Adults from 30 Countries Prior to and During the Initial Coronavirus Disease 2019 Wave

Jennifer Toller Erausquin et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: There is limited evidence to date about changes to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) during the initial wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). To address this gap, our team organized a multicountry, cross-sectional online survey as part of a global consortium.

Methods: Consortium research teams conducted online surveys in 30 countries. Sampling methods included convenience, online panels, and population-representative. Primary outcomes included sexual behaviors, partner violence, and SRH service use, and we compared 3 months prior to and during policy measures to mitigate COVID-19. We conducted meta-analyses for primary outcomes and graded the certainty of the evidence.

Results: Among 4546 respondents with casual partners, condom use stayed the same for 3374 (74.4%), and 640 (14.1%) reported a decline. Fewer respondents reported physical or sexual partner violence during COVID-19 measures (1063 of 15 144, 7.0%) compared to before COVID-19 measures (1469 of 15 887, 9.3%). COVID-19 measures impeded access to condoms (933 of 10 790, 8.7%), contraceptives (610 of 8175, 7.5%), and human immunodeficiency virus/sexually transmitted infection (HIV/STI) testing (750 of 1965, 30.7%). Pooled estimates from meta-analysis indicate that during COVID-19 measures, 32.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.9%-42.1%) of people needing HIV/STI testing had hindered access, 4.4% (95% CI, 3.4%-5.4%) experienced partner violence, and 5.8% (95% CI, 5.4%-8.2%) decreased casual partner condom use (moderate certainty of evidence for each outcome). Meta-analysis findings were robust in sensitivity analyses that examined country income level, sample size, and sampling strategy.

Conclusions: Open science methods are feasible to organize research studies as part of emergency responses. The initial COVID-19 wave impacted SRH behaviors and access to services across diverse global settings.

Keywords: HIV; condom use; sexual behavior; sexual violence; sexually transmitted infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
World map with the 25 countries included in the I-SHARE shaded. Abbreviation: I-SHARE, International Sexual Health And REproductive Health during COVID-19 Study.

Update of

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hall KS, Samari G, Garbers S, et al. Centring sexual and reproductive health and justice in the global COVID-19 response. The Lancet 2020; 395:1175–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hall B, Tucker JD.. Surviving in place: the coronavirus domestic violence syndemic. Asian Journal of Psychiatry 2020; 53:102179. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Disruption in HIV, hepatitis and STI services due to COVID-19. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2020.
    1. Anderson RM, Heesterbeek H, Klinkenberg D, Hollingsworth TD.. How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? The Lancet 2020; 395:931–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hale T, Petherick A, Phillips T, Webster S.. Variation in government responses to COVID-19. Blavatnik school of government working paper. 2020; 31:2020–11.

Publication types