Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Dec;29(6):691-704.
doi: 10.1007/s12529-021-10051-9. Epub 2022 Feb 8.

Effects of Psychotherapy on Hope/Hopelessness in Adults with Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effects of Psychotherapy on Hope/Hopelessness in Adults with Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Jing Luo et al. Int J Behav Med. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Although psychotherapy is a common treatment for hopelessness and hope, the effectiveness remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively synthesize available evidence related to the effect of a broad range of psychotherapy interventions on hope/hopelessness in cancer patients.

Method: Eight electronic databases were searched for studies with adult cancer patients (mean age ≥ 18 years) receiving psychotherapy interventions with hope/hopelessness measured as outcomes and written in English. We used the random-effects model to compute effect size using Hedges' g and conducted moderator analyses.

Results: We found 27 primary studies which included 1,998 participants who were 57.6 ± 8.0 years old across studies. The psychotherapy effect size ranged from - 0.86 to 2.92. Researchers who conducted psychotherapy at hospital/health centers showed higher effects, that is, improved hope scores (g = 0.63), than those who conducted psychotherapy in the community (g = 0.05). When researchers enrolled participants alone, psychotherapy resulted in higher effects (g = 0.62) than when partners/caregivers were involved (g = - 0.04). Researchers who included group discussion showed lower effects (g = 0.36) than without group discussion (g = 1.10). Researchers who examined fidelity found lower effects (g = 0.16) than researchers who did not examine fidelity (g = 0.66). Interestingly, researchers who studied people with breast cancer showed higher effects (g = 0.96) than those who studied people with other types of cancer (g = 0.26). Researchers who included higher percentages of women showed greater effects (slope = 0.008, Qmodel = 3.99, p = 0.046). Finally, the greater the time span between psychotherapy and the measurement of hope, the lower the psychotherapy effects (slope = - 0.002, Qmodel = 4.25, p = 0.039).

Conclusion: Psychotherapy had a solid moderate effect on reducing hopelessness and improving hope in cancer patients compared to controls.

Keywords: Cancer; Hope; Hopelessness; Meta-analysis; Psychotherapy; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. World Health Organization (WHO). Cancer. 2018.
    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Cancer Tomorrow. 2020.
    1. Uslu-Sahan F, Terzioglu F, Koc G. Hopelessness, death anxiety, and social support of hospitalized patients with gynecologic cancer and their caregivers. Cancer Nurs. 2019;42(5):373–80. - PubMed
    1. Bakan AB, Zdemir S. Effect of knowing the diagnosis or not on cancer patients’ hopelessness levels. 2018.
    1. Meggiolaro E, et al. Cancer patients’ emotional distress, coping styles and perception of doctor-patient interaction in European cancer settings. Palliat Support Care. 2016;14(3):204–11. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources