Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0147721.
doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01477-21. Epub 2022 Feb 9.

Intrathecal Synthesis Index of Specific Anti- Treponema IgG: a New Tool for the Diagnosis of Neurosyphilis

Affiliations

Intrathecal Synthesis Index of Specific Anti- Treponema IgG: a New Tool for the Diagnosis of Neurosyphilis

Chloé Alberto et al. Microbiol Spectr. .

Abstract

Neurosyphilis (NS) diagnosis is challenging because clinical signs are diverse and unspecific, and a sensitive and specific laboratory test is lacking. We tested the performance of an antibody index (AI) for intrathecal synthesis of specific anti-Treponema IgG by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for NS diagnosis. We conducted a retroprospective monocentric study including adults with neurological symptoms who had serum and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) samples collected between 2006 and 2021. Two NS definitions were used. NS1 included patients with neurological symptoms, positive Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) serology, and CSF-TPPA of ≥320, as well as CSF-leukocytes of >5 cells/mm3 and/or CSF-protein of >0.45 g/L and/or a reactive CSF-VDRL/RPR test. NS2 included patients with acute ocular and/or otologic symptoms, positive TPPA serology, and a response to NS treatment. Controls were patients with central nervous system disorders other than neurosyphilis. Anti-Treponema pallidum IgG were measured simultaneously in serum and CSF, and AI was calculated according to Reiber diagram. We assessed the AI test area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity/specificity, and estimated positive and negative predictive values. In total, 16 NS1 patients, 11 NS2 patients, and 71 controls were included. With an AI of ≥1.7 as a positive test for NS diagnostic, specificity was 98.6% (95% confidence interval [CI 95%] of 92.4 to 100.0) and sensitivity was 81.3% (CI 95% of 54.4 to 96.0) for NS1 and 98.6% (CI 95% 92.4 to 100.0) and 27.3% (CI 95% 6.0 to 61.0), respectively, for NS2. Positive and negative predictive values were >95% for NS1 and >85% for NS2, for prevalence above and below 20%. Measuring an AI for intrathecal synthesis of specific anti-Treponema pallidum IgG is a new promising tool highly specific for NS diagnosis. IMPORTANCE In the context of a lack of a gold standard for the diagnosis of neurosyphilis due to either nonspecific or nonsensitive tests, we present in this article a new promising tool highly specific for NS diagnosis. This new test involves measuring an intrathecal synthesis index of specific anti-Treponema IgG by ELISA.

Keywords: intrathecal synthesis; neurosyphilis; ocular syphilis; otosyphilis; specific anti-treponema IgG.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Sensitivity/(1 − specificity) and AUC of AI test in cases of NS1.
FIG 2
FIG 2
PPV/PNV of AI test for the diagnostic of NS1 using the optimal threshold >1.7.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dombrowski JC, Pedersen R, Marra CM, Kerani RP, Golden MR. 2015. Prevalence estimates of complicated syphilis. Sex Transm Dis 42:702–704. doi:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000368. - DOI - PubMed
    1. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City STD Prevention Training Center. 2019. The diagnosis, management and prevention of syphilis: an update and review. https://www.ncsddc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Syphilis_Monograph_201....
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. 2019. Syphilis and congenital syphilis in Europe: a review of epidemiological trends (2007–2018) and options for response. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/syphilis-and-congenital-....
    1. Ghanem KG, Ram S, Rice PA. 2020. The modern epidemic of syphilis. N Engl J Med 382:845–854. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1901593. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marra CM. 2009. Update on neurosyphilis. Curr Infect Dis Rep 11:127–134. doi:10.1007/s11908-009-0019-1. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources