Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 9;8(1):e32747.
doi: 10.2196/32747.

Digital Teaching in Medical Education: Scientific Literature Landscape Review

Affiliations

Digital Teaching in Medical Education: Scientific Literature Landscape Review

Andy Wai Kan Yeung et al. JMIR Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Digital teaching in medical education has grown in popularity in the recent years. However, to the best of our knowledge, no bibliometric report to date has been published that analyzes this important literature set to reveal prevailing topics and trends and their impacts reflected in citation counts.

Objective: We used a bibliometric approach to unveil and evaluate the scientific literature on digital teaching research in medical education, demonstrating recurring research topics, productive authors, research organizations, countries, and journals. We further aimed to discuss some of the topics and findings reported by specific highly cited works.

Methods: The Web of Science electronic database was searched to identify relevant papers on digital teaching research in medical education. Basic bibliographic data were obtained by the "Analyze" and "Create Citation Report" functions of the database. Complete bibliographic data were exported to VOSviewer for further analyses. Visualization maps were generated to display the recurring author keywords and terms mentioned in the titles and abstracts of the publications.

Results: The analysis was based on data from 3978 papers that were identified. The literature received worldwide contributions with the most productive countries being the United States and United Kingdom. Reviews were significantly more cited, but the citations between open access vs non-open access papers did not significantly differ. Some themes were cited more often, reflected by terms such as virtual reality, innovation, trial, effectiveness, and anatomy. Different aspects in medical education were experimented for digital teaching, such as gross anatomy education, histology, complementary medicine, medicinal chemistry, and basic life support. Some studies have shown that digital teaching could increase learning satisfaction, knowledge gain, and even cost-effectiveness. More studies were conducted on trainees than on undergraduate students.

Conclusions: Digital teaching in medical education is expected to flourish in the future, especially during this era of COVID-19 pandemic.

Keywords: anatomy; augmented reality; basic life support; bibliometric; citation; digital teaching; life support; literature; medical education; medicine; online learning; satisfaction; trend; virtual reality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cumulative publication and citation count of digital teaching in medical education.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Term map showing recurring terms (n≥40) from the titles and abstracts of the analyzed papers. Bubble colors indicate citations per publication, their size indicates frequency count, and their proximity indicates the frequency of their coappearance.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Term map showing recurring author keywords (n≥3) from the analyzed papers. Bubble color indicates (a) citations per publication and (b) average normalized citations (score of >1 indicates higher-than-average citations). Bubble sizes indicate frequency count and their proximity indicates the frequency of their coappearances.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Term map showing recurring terms from the titles and abstracts of the papers from low-income economies. Bubble colors indicate citations per publication, their size indicates frequency count, and their proximity indicates the frequency of their coappearance.

References

    1. Moore JL, Dickson-Deane C, Galyen K. e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education. 2011 Mar;14(2):129–135. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001. - DOI
    1. Harasim L. Shift happens: online education as a new paradigm in learning. The Internet and Higher Education. 2000 Jan;3(1-2):41–61. doi: 10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00032-4. - DOI
    1. Mishra P, Koehler MJ. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Rec. 2006 Jun;108(6):1017–1054. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x. - DOI
    1. Garrison D, Anderson T, Archer W. Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education. 1999 Mar;2(2-3):87–105. doi: 10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6. - DOI
    1. Roddy C, Amiet D, Chung J, Holt C, Shaw L, McKenzie S, Garivaldis F, Lodge Jm, Mundy Me. Applying Best Practice Online Learning, Teaching, and Support to Intensive Online Environments: An Integrative Review. Front. Educ. 2017 Nov 21;2:a. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2017.00059. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources