The role of the neural stimulus in regulating skeletal muscle hypertrophy
- PMID: 35138447
- DOI: 10.1007/s00421-022-04906-6
The role of the neural stimulus in regulating skeletal muscle hypertrophy
Abstract
Resistance training is frequently performed with the goal of stimulating muscle hypertrophy. Due to the key roles motor unit recruitment and mechanical tension play to induce muscle growth, when programming, the manipulation of the training variables is oriented to provoke the correct stimulus. Although it is known that the nervous system is responsible for the control of motor units and active muscle force, muscle hypertrophy researchers and trainers tend to only focus on the adaptations of the musculotendinous unit and not in the nervous system behaviour. To better guide resistance exercise prescription for muscle hypertrophy and aiming to delve into the mechanisms that maximize this goal, this review provides evidence-based considerations for possible effects of neural behaviour on muscle growth when programming resistance training, and future neurophysiological measurement that should be tested when training to increase muscle mass. Combined information from the neural and muscular structures will allow to understand the exact adaptations of the muscle in response to a given input (neural drive to the muscle). Changes at different levels of the nervous system will affect the control of motor units and mechanical forces during resistance training, thus impacting the potential hypertrophic adaptations. Additionally, this article addresses how neural adaptations and fatigue accumulation that occur when resistance training may influence the hypertrophic response and propose neurophysiological assessments that may improve our understanding of resistance training variables that impact on muscular adaptations.
Keywords: Fatigue; Muscle growth; Neural adaptations; Neuroscience; Resistance training.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Andersen JL et al (2002) Neural adaptation to resistance training: changes in evoked V-wave and H-reflex responses. J Appl Physiol 92:2309–2318. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01185.2001 - DOI
-
- Alix-Fages C, Romero-Arenas S et al (2019) Short-term effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on endurance and maximal force production. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 8:536. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040536 - DOI
-
- Alix-Fages C, García-Ramos A, Calderón-Nadal G et al (2020) Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances strength training volume but not the force–velocity profile. Eur J Appl Physiol 120:1881–1891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04417-2 - DOI
-
- Alix-Fages C, Garcia-Ramos A, Romero-Arenas S et al (2021) Transcranial direct current stimulation does not affect sprint performance or the horizontal force-velocity profile. Res Q Exerc Sport. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2021.1893260 - DOI
-
- Allen DG, Lamb GD, Westerblad H (2008) Skeletal muscle fatigue: cellular mechanisms. Physiol Rev 88:287–332. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00015.2007 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
