Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr;24(4):439-444.
doi: 10.1007/s11886-022-01661-0. Epub 2022 Feb 9.

Methods of Blood Pressure Measurement to Predict Hypertension-Related Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality

Affiliations
Review

Methods of Blood Pressure Measurement to Predict Hypertension-Related Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality

Thwe Htay et al. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose of review: As the evidence on different blood pressure phenotypes and their cardiovascular risks evolve, it is imperative to evaluate the reliability of office blood pressure (OBP), ambulatory blood pressure (ABP), and home blood pressure (HBP) measurements and their associations with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Recent findings: HBP is more reliable in diagnosis of hypertension than OBP or ABP. HBP correlates better with left ventricular mass index (LVMI). Increasing systolic HBP is associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and cardiovascular events. An elevated systolic ABP is also associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. ABP is a better predictor of cardiovascular events than OBP in diabetics. ABP and HBP furnish additional information beyond OBP. They correlate better with cardiovascular outcomes and are more helpful with monitoring therapy than OBP. Comparative effectiveness studies of all three methods associating with cardiovascular outcomes are warranted.

Keywords: Ambulatory blood pressure; Blood pressure measurements; Cardiovascular risk factor; Home blood pressure; Hypertension; Left ventricular mass; Office blood pressure.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
    1. Viera AJ, Shimbo D, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure phenotypes and the risk for hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2014;16(10):481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-014-0481-5 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Kaczorowski J, Dawes M, Gelfer M, et al. Measurement of blood pressure: new developments and challenges. BC Med J. 2012;54(8):399–403.
    1. Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Borgioni C, Ciucci A, Zampi I, Gattobigio R, Sacchi N, Porcellati C, et al. White coat hypertension and white coat effect. Similarities and differences. Am J Hypertens. 1995;8(8):790–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7061(95)00151-E . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pickering TG, Gerin W, Schwartz JE, Spruill TM, Davidson KW, et al. Franz Volhard lecture: should doctors still measure blood pressure? The missing patients with masked hypertension. J Hypertens. 2008;26(12):2259–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e32831313c4 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Banegas JR, Ruilope LM, de la Sierra A, Vinyoles E, Gorostidi M, de la Cruz JJ, Segura J, Oliveras A, Martell N, García-Puig J, Williams B, et al. Clinic versus daytime ambulatory blood pressure difference in hypertensive patients: the impact of age and clinic blood pressure. Hypertension. 2017;69(2):211–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.08567 . - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources