Effects of Dietary Supplementation with Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bacillus subtilis on Mucosal Immunity and Intestinal Barrier Are Associated with Its Modulation of Gut Metabolites and Microbiota in Late-Phase Laying Hens
- PMID: 35138584
- DOI: 10.1007/s12602-022-09923-7
Effects of Dietary Supplementation with Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bacillus subtilis on Mucosal Immunity and Intestinal Barrier Are Associated with Its Modulation of Gut Metabolites and Microbiota in Late-Phase Laying Hens
Abstract
We investigated the effects of dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bacillus subtilis on the intestinal immune response, intestinal barrier function, cecal microbiota profile, and metabolite profile in late-phase laying hens. Hens were divided into three groups and fed with the basal diet (NC group), basal diet supplementation with 250 mg/kg B. subtilis and L. acidophilus mixture powder (LD group), and basal diet supplementation with 500 mg/kg B. subtilis and L. acidophilus mixture powder (HD group), respectively. The results indicated that the dietary supplementation with L. acidophilus and B. subtilis increased the integrity of the intestinal barrier as evidenced by the significant increase in the number of ileal goblet cells and improve the expression of occludin, claudin-1, and ZO-1 genes in the HD group. Moreover, the levels of IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-γ were significantly decreased in the LD and HD groups. The levels of immunoglobulin G (IgG) increased in the LD and HD group, and the levels of secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) increased with the HD treatment. Furthermore, 16 s rRNA sequencing revealed L. acidophilus in combination with B. subtilis increased the diversity of gut microbiota. The metabolomic analysis revealed beneficial changes in the amino acid metabolism and lipid metabolism (decrease in LysoPC and LysoPE levels). In conclusion, dietary supplementation with L. acidophilus and B. subtilis could improve intestinal barrier function and maintain immune homeostasis. These beneficial effects may be associated with the modulation of the intestinal microbiome and metabolites.
Keywords: Immune responses; Intestinal barrier; Late-phase laying hens; Metabolomics; Microbiota; Probiotics.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Ge YT, Lin SM, Li BW, Yang YH, Tang X, Shi YH, Sun J, Le GW (2020) Oxidized pork induces oxidative stress and inflammation by altering gut microbiota in mice. Mol Nutr Food Res 64(2):e1901012. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201901012 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Li X, Mao MY, Zhang YN, Yu KF, Zhu WY (2019) Succinate modulates intestinal barrier function and inflammation response in pigs. Biomolecules 9(9):486. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9090486 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Bron PA, Kleerebezem M, Brummer RJ, Cani PD, Mercenier A, MacDonald TT, Garcia-Rodenas CL, Wells JM (2017) Can probiotics modulate human disease by impacting intestinal barrier function? Br J Nutr 117(1):93–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114516004037 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Paone P, Cani PD (2020) Mucus barrier, mucins and gut microbiota: the expected slimy partners? Gut 69(12):2232–2243. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322260 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Honda K, Littman DR (2016) The microbiota in adaptive immune homeostasis and disease. Nature 535(7610):75–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18848 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials