Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul;20(4):457-465.
doi: 10.1007/s40258-022-00718-z. Epub 2022 Feb 9.

Data-Related Challenges in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Vaccines

Affiliations

Data-Related Challenges in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Vaccines

Jamison Pike et al. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) are often prepared to quantify the expected economic value of potential vaccination strategies. Estimated outcomes and costs of vaccination strategies depend on numerous data inputs or assumptions, including estimates of vaccine efficacy and disease incidence in the absence of vaccination. Limitations in epidemiologic data can meaningfully affect both CEA estimates and the interpretation of those results by groups involved in vaccination policy decisions. Developers of CEAs should be transparent with regard to the ambiguity and uncertainty associated with epidemiologic information that is incorporated into their models. We describe selected data-related challenges to conducting CEAs for vaccination strategies, including generalizability of estimates of vaccine effectiveness, duration and functional form of vaccine protection that can change over time, indirect (herd) protection, and serotype replacement. We illustrate how CEA estimates can be sensitive to variations in specific epidemiologic assumptions, with examples from CEAs conducted for the USA that assessed vaccinations against human papillomavirus and pneumococcal disease. These challenges are certainly not limited to these two case studies and may be relevant to other vaccines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests: Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhou F, Shefer A, Wenger J, Messonnier M, Wang LY, Lopez A, et al. Economic evaluation of the routine childhood immunization program in the United States, 2009. 2014;133(4):577–85. - PubMed
    1. Whitney CG, Zhou F, Singleton J, Schuchat AJMM, report mw. Benefits from immunization during the vaccines for children program era—United States, 1994–2013 (Supplement: Methodology). 2014;63(16):352. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhou F, Shefer A, Wenger J, Messonnier M, Wang LY, Lopez A, et al. Economic evaluation of the routine childhood immunization program in the United States, 2009. Pediatrics. 2014;133(4):577–85. - PubMed
    1. Leidner AJ, Murthy N, Chesson HW, Biggerstaff M, Stoecker C, Harris AM, et al. Cost-effectiveness of adult vaccinations: A systematic review. Vaccine. 2019;37(2):226–34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mauskopf J, Standaert B, Connolly MP, Culyer AJ, Garrison LP, Hutubessy R, et al. Economic analysis of vaccination programs: an ISPOR good practices for outcomes research task force report. Value in Health. 2018;21(10):1133–49. - PubMed

Substances