Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan 24:12:663222.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.663222. eCollection 2021.

Expert Panel Recommendations for Use of Standardized Glucose Reporting System Based on Standardized Glucometrics Plus Visual Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) Data in Clinical Practice

Selcuk Dagdelen  1 , Oguzhan Deyneli  2 , Nevin Dinccag  3 , Hasan Ilkova  4 , Zeynep Osar Siva  4 , Ilhan Yetkin  5 , Temel Yilmaz  6
Affiliations
Review

Expert Panel Recommendations for Use of Standardized Glucose Reporting System Based on Standardized Glucometrics Plus Visual Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) Data in Clinical Practice

Selcuk Dagdelen et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). .

Abstract

This expert panel of diabetes specialists aimed to provide guidance to healthcare providers on the best practice in the use of innovative continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) techniques through a practical and implementable document that specifically addresses the rationale for and also analysis and interpretation of the new standardized glucose reporting system based on standardized CGM metrics and visual ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) data. This guidance document presents recommendations and a useful algorithm for the use of a standardized glucose reporting system in the routine diabetes care setting.

Keywords: algorithm; ambulatory glucose profile; clinical utility; continuous glucose monitoring; diabetes care; expert opinion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Glucose statistics and targets.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Glucose Management Indicator.
Figure 3
Figure 3
AGP report.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Recommendations for the use of AGP in clinical practice—Type 1 Diabetes.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Recommendations for the use of AGP in clinical practice—Type 2 Diabetes.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Example of using AGP in diabetes care: Treatment modifications and follow up outcome.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bergenstal RM, Ahmann AJ, Bailey T, Beck RW, Bissen J, Buckingham B, et al. . Recommendations for Standardizing Glucose Reporting and Analysis to Optimize Clinical Decision Making in Diabetes: The Ambulatory Glucose Profile. J Diabetes Sci Technol (2013) 7:562–78. doi: 10.1177/193229681300700234 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maran A, Esposito K, Toni S, Giordano C. Ambulatory Glucose Profile Applied to Flash Glucose Monitoring in Real Life: An Expert Opinion. J Diabetes Sci Technol (2017) 11:633–4. doi: 10.1177/1932296816674739 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siegmund T, Matthaei S, Reuter M, Reichel A, Kellerer M, Kröger J. Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP): Recommendations for Use in Clinical Setting. Diabetes Stoffwechsel und Herz (2015) 24:115–20.
    1. Matthaei S, Dealaiz RA, Bosi E, Evans M, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn N, Joubert M. Consensus Recommendations for the Use of Ambulatory Glucose Profile in Clinical Practice. Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis (2014) 14:153–7. doi: 10.15277/bjdvd.2014.046 - DOI
    1. Evans M, Cranston I, Bailey CJ. Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP): Utility in UK Clinical Practice. Br J Diabetes (2017) 17:26–33. doi: 10.15277/bjd.2017.121 - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms