Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;42(6):705-716.
doi: 10.1002/pd.6111. Epub 2022 Feb 21.

Retrospective identification of prenatal fetal anomalies associated with diagnostic neonatal genomic sequencing results

Affiliations

Retrospective identification of prenatal fetal anomalies associated with diagnostic neonatal genomic sequencing results

Kathy Zhang-Rutledge et al. Prenat Diagn. 2022 May.

Abstract

Objective: To determine which types of fetal anomalies are associated with postnatal diagnoses of genetic diseases by genomic sequencing and to assess how prenatal genomic sequencing could affect clinical management.

Method: This was a secondary analysis of the second Newborn Sequencing in Genomic Medicine and Public Health study that compared fetal imaging results in critically ill infants who had actionable versus negative postnatal genomic sequencing results.

Results: Of 213 infants who received genomic sequencing, 80 had available prenatal ultrasounds. Twenty-one (26%) of these were found to have genetic diseases by genomic sequencing. Fourteen (67%) of the 21 with genetic diseases had suspected anomalies prenatally, compared with 33 (56%) of 59 with negative results. Among fetuses with suspected anomalies, genetic diseases were 4.5 times more common in those with multiple anomalies and 6.7 times more common in those with anomalies of the extremities compared to those with negative results. Had the genetic diseases been diagnosed prenatally, clinical management would have been altered in 13 of 14.

Conclusion: Critically ill infants with diagnostic genomic sequencing were more likely to have multiple anomalies and anomalies of the extremities on fetal imaging. Among almost all infants with suspected fetal anomalies and diagnostic genomic sequencing results, prenatal diagnosis would have likely altered clinical management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Flow diagram of the number of infants in the NSIGHT2 who had available prenatal imaging by genomic sequencing result and anomalies on prenatal imaging

References

    1. Petrovski S, Aggarwal V, Giordano JL, et al. Whole-exome sequencing in the evaluation of fetal structural anomalies: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2019; 393:758–67. - PubMed
    1. Lord J, McMullan DJ, Eberhardt RY, et al. Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography (PAGE): a cohort study. Lancet 2019;393:747–57. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Normand EA, Braxton A, Nassef S, et al. Clinical Exome Sequencing for Fetuses with Ultrasound Abnormalities and a Suspected Mendelian Disorder. Genome Medicine 2018;10:74. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fu F, Li R, Li Y, et al. Whole Exome Sequencing as a Diagnostic Adjunct to Clinical Testing in Fetuses with Structural Abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018;51:493–502. - PubMed
    1. Lefebvre M, Bruel A, Tisserant E, et al. Genotype-first in a Cohort of 95 Fetuses with Multiple Congenital Abnormalities: When Exome Sequencing Reveals Unexpected Fetal Phenotype-genotype Correlations. J Med Genet 2020;jmedgenet-2020–106867. - PubMed