Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr;51(3):1495-1501.
doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02197-0. Epub 2022 Feb 10.

The Influence of Social Desirability on Sexual Behavior Surveys: A Review

Affiliations
Review

The Influence of Social Desirability on Sexual Behavior Surveys: A Review

Bruce M King. Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Research in fields for which self-reported behaviors can be compared with factual data reveals that misreporting is pervasive and often extreme. The degree of misreporting is correlated with the level of social desirability, i.e., the need to respond in a culturally appropriate manner. People who are influenced by social desirability tend to over-report culturally desired behaviors and under-report undesired behaviors. This paper reviews socially desirable responding in sexual behavior research. Given the very private nature of the sexual activity, sex researchers generally lack a gold standard by which to compare self-reported sexual behaviors and have relied on the anonymity of participants as the methodology to assure honest answers on sexual behavior surveys. However, indirect evidence indicates that under-reporting (e.g., of a number of sexual partners, receptive anal intercourse, condom use) is common. Among the general population, several studies have now reported that even with anonymous responding, there are significant correlations between a variety of self-reported sexual behaviors (e.g., use of condoms, sexual fantasies, exposure to pornography, penis size) and social desirability, with evidence that extreme under- or over-reporting is as common as is found in other fields. When asking highly sensitive questions, sex researchers should always include a measure of social desirability and take that into account when analyzing their results.

Keywords: Response bias; Sexual behavior; Sexual behavior surveys; Social desirability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author has no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alexander MG, Fisher TD. Truth and consequences: Using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality. Journal of Sex Research. 2003;40:27–36. doi: 10.1080/00224490309552164. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Archer E, Hand GA, Blair SN. Validity of U.S. nutritional surveillance: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey caloric intake data, 1971–2010. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e76632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076632. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Archer E, Pavela G, Lavie CJ. The inadmissibility of What We Eat in America and NHANES dietary data in nutrition and obesity research and the scientific formulation of national dietary guidelines. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2015;90(7):911–926. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.04.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bergen N, Labonte R. “Everything is perfect, and we have no problem”: Detecting and limiting social desirability bias in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research. 2020;30:783–792. doi: 10.1177/1049732319889354. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bernard HR, Killworth P, Kronenfeld D, Sailer L. The problem of informant accuracy: The validity of retrospective data. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1984;13:495–517. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.002431. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources