Evaluation of hearing protection device effectiveness for musicians
- PMID: 35143376
- PMCID: PMC11915204
- DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2035831
Evaluation of hearing protection device effectiveness for musicians
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate musicians' personal attenuation and perceptions of three types of hearing protection devices (HPDs): formable foam earplugs and both non-custom and custom versions of uniform attenuation earplugs (UAEs) marketed to musicians.
Design: A mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate the HPDs. Audiometric testing obtained hearing levels at baseline and with each HPD across frequencies (125-8000 Hz) to determine personal attenuation ratings and uniformity of attenuation. Participants completed surveys over six months regarding how often they used the HPDs and their perceptions about wearing them.
Study sample: Twenty-four musicians were recruited to participate.
Results: Substantial variability was observed in the attenuation achieved among participants for each HPD type, but custom UAEs provided the most consistent attenuation across frequencies. Participants' HPD preferences were influenced by multiple factors including personal instrument and specific activity. Custom UAEs were most frequently used but usage rates continually decreased over the 6-month period.
Conclusions: Fit-testing is important to determine fit and sizing. Combining information on the effectiveness of HPDs with musicians' opinions about wearing them can inform recommendations for which types may be the most effective and feasible options for reducing sound exposures.
Keywords: Audiometry; attenuation; earplugs; hearing conservation; music instructor.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Similar articles
-
A scoping review of the prevalence of musicians' hearing loss.Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 13;13:1472134. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1472134. eCollection 2025. Front Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40017553 Free PMC article.
-
Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.Noise Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;13(51):176-88. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.77210. Noise Health. 2011. PMID: 21368443
-
Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.Ann Occup Hyg. 2013 Jun;57(5):571-80. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mes096. Epub 2012 Dec 24. Ann Occup Hyg. 2013. PMID: 23267007
-
Verification of Attenuation for Premolded Hearing Protection Devices Designed for Music.Med Probl Perform Art. 2022 Jun;37(2):78-88. doi: 10.21091/mppa.2022.2013. Med Probl Perform Art. 2022. PMID: 35637560
-
Individual fit-testing of earplugs: a review of uses.Noise Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;13(51):152-62. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.77216. Noise Health. 2011. PMID: 21368441 Review.
Cited by
-
A scoping review of the prevalence of musicians' hearing loss.Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 13;13:1472134. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1472134. eCollection 2025. Front Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40017553 Free PMC article.
References
-
- 3M. 2015. “Laboratory attenuation data for 3M hearing protection products (tested in accordance with ANSI S3.19-1974).” Accessed 2019. https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/1087607O/laboratory-attenuation-data...
-
- Berger EH 2013. “‘Calibrating’ the Insertion Depth of Roll-down Foam Earplugs.” Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics ICA2013 19(1): 040002. doi:10.1121/1.4800461. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical