Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar;62(3):238-244.
doi: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2035831. Epub 2022 Feb 10.

Evaluation of hearing protection device effectiveness for musicians

Affiliations

Evaluation of hearing protection device effectiveness for musicians

Kathryn Crawford et al. Int J Audiol. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate musicians' personal attenuation and perceptions of three types of hearing protection devices (HPDs): formable foam earplugs and both non-custom and custom versions of uniform attenuation earplugs (UAEs) marketed to musicians.

Design: A mixed-methods approach was used to evaluate the HPDs. Audiometric testing obtained hearing levels at baseline and with each HPD across frequencies (125-8000 Hz) to determine personal attenuation ratings and uniformity of attenuation. Participants completed surveys over six months regarding how often they used the HPDs and their perceptions about wearing them.

Study sample: Twenty-four musicians were recruited to participate.

Results: Substantial variability was observed in the attenuation achieved among participants for each HPD type, but custom UAEs provided the most consistent attenuation across frequencies. Participants' HPD preferences were influenced by multiple factors including personal instrument and specific activity. Custom UAEs were most frequently used but usage rates continually decreased over the 6-month period.

Conclusions: Fit-testing is important to determine fit and sizing. Combining information on the effectiveness of HPDs with musicians' opinions about wearing them can inform recommendations for which types may be the most effective and feasible options for reducing sound exposures.

Keywords: Audiometry; attenuation; earplugs; hearing conservation; music instructor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. 3M. 2015. “Laboratory attenuation data for 3M hearing protection products (tested in accordance with ANSI S3.19-1974).” Accessed 2019. https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/1087607O/laboratory-attenuation-data...
    1. Beach E, and O’Brien I. 2017. “In Their Own Words: Interviews with Musicians Reveal the Advantages and Disadvantages of Wearing Earplugs.” Medical Problems of Performing Artists 32 (2): 101–110. doi:10.21091/mppa.2017.2017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Behar A, MacDonald E, Lee J, Cui J, Kunov H, and Wong W. 2004. “Noise Exposure of Music Teachers.” Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 1 (4): 243–247. doi:10.1080/15459620490432178. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berger EH 2013. “‘Calibrating’ the Insertion Depth of Roll-down Foam Earplugs.” Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics ICA2013 19(1): 040002. doi:10.1121/1.4800461. - DOI
    1. Berger EH, Kieper RW, and Gauger D. 2003. “Hearing Protection: Surpassing the Limits to Attenuation Imposed by the Bone-Conduction Pathways.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 114 (4): 1955–1967. doi:10.1121/1.1605415. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms