The Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire has poor diagnostic accuracy in people with intermittent claudication
- PMID: 35143731
- PMCID: PMC9936437
- DOI: 10.1177/17085381211059665
The Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire has poor diagnostic accuracy in people with intermittent claudication
Abstract
Background: The screening and diagnosis of intermittent claudication is a challenging process and often relies on the expertise of specialist vascular clinicians. We sought to investigate the diagnostic performance of the Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire (ECQ) as a screening tool for referrals of suspected intermittent claudication from primary to secondary care.
Method: Prospectively, 100 referrals from primary care with a stated diagnosis or query regarding intermittent claudication were recruited. All participants who completed the ECQ, underwent an anklebrachial pressure index (ABPI) assessment and treadmill exercise testing. Outcomes of the ECQ were compared to clinical diagnoses of intermittent claudication.
Results: The ECQ had a sensitivity of 46.8% (95% CI: 27-65%), specificity of 63.2% (95% CI: 43-82%) and accuracy of 53.0% (95% CI: 43-63%). The diagnostic performance was not changed by combining the ECQ with a positive ABPI or post-exercise ABPI outcome for PAD.
Conclusion: The ECQ had a poor diagnostic performance in this cohort. Considering the results found here and in other recent studies, the utility of the ECQ as a screening tool and epidemiological survey tool must be questioned. Novel, low-resource diagnostic tools are needed in this population.
Keywords: Intermittent claudication; diagnosis; peripheral artery disease.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Fowkes FGR, Rudan D, Rudan I, et al. Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: a systematic review and analysis. Lancet 2013; 382(9901): 1329–1340. - PubMed
-
- Song P, Rudan D, Zhu Y, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2015: an updated systematic review and analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2019; 7(8): e1020–e1030. - PubMed
-
- Selvin E, Erlinger TP. Prevalence of and risk factors for peripheral arterial disease in the United States. Circulation 2004; 110(6): 738–743. - PubMed
-
- Norgen L, Hiatt W, Dormandy J, et al. TASC II: trans-atlantic inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease on behalf of the TASC II working group. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 33. - PubMed
-
- Chetter IC, Spark JI, Dolan P, et al. Quality of life analysis in patients with lower limb ischaemia: suggestions for European standardisation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997; 13(6): 597–604. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
