Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Feb 10;17(1):9.
doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00415-1.

Cost analysis of negative-pressure wound therapy versus standard treatment of acute conflict-related extremity wounds within a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cost analysis of negative-pressure wound therapy versus standard treatment of acute conflict-related extremity wounds within a randomized controlled trial

Andreas Älgå et al. World J Emerg Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Clinical outcomes after negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and standard treatment of conflict-related extremity wounds are similar. In resource-limited settings, cost affects the choice of treatment. We aimed to estimate treatment-related costs of NPWT in comparison with standard treatment for conflict-related extremity wounds.

Methods: We derived outcome data from a randomized, controlled superiority trial that enrolled adult (≥ 18 years) patients with acute (≤ 72 h) conflict-related extremity wounds at two civilian hospitals in Jordan and Iraq. Primary endpoint was mean treatment-related healthcare costs (adjusted to 2019 US dollars).

Results: Patients were enrolled from June 9, 2015, to October 24, 2018. A total of 165 patients (155 men [93.9%]; 10 women [6.1%]; and median [IQR] age, 28 [21-34] years) were included in the analysis. The cost per patient treated with NPWT was $142 above that of standard treatment. Overall, results were robust in a sensitivity analysis.

Conclusions: With similar clinical outcomes compared to standard care, our results do not support the use of NPWT in routine treatment of conflict-related extremity wounds at civilian hospitals in resource scarce settings. Trial registration NCT02444598.

Keywords: Armed conflict; Cost analysis; Trauma; Wounds.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Trial profile. NPWT, negative-pressure wound therapy; LAMA, left against medical advice
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean costs per treated patient. Currency data are in 2019 US dollars. NPWT, negative-pressure wound therapy

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aboutanos MB, Baker SP. Wartime civilian injuries: epidemiology and intervention strategies. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 1997;43:719–726. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199710000-00031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Älgå A, Herzog KK, Alrawashdeh M, et al. “Reality rarely looks like the guidelines”: a qualitative study of the challenges hospital-based physicians encounter in war wound management. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018;26:52. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0517-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Älgå A, Wong S, Shoaib M, et al. Infection with high proportion of multidrug-resistant bacteria in conflict-related injuries is associated with poor outcomes and excess resource consumption: a cohort study of Syrian patients treated in Jordan. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18:233. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3149-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Guha-Sapir D, van Panhuis WG. The importance of conflict-related mortality in civilian populations. Lancet. 2003;361:2126–2128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13691-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Apelqvist J, Willy C, Fagerdahl AM, et al. EWMA Document: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. J Wound Care. 2017;26:S1–S154. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.Sup3.S1. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data