Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 10;14(1):24.
doi: 10.1186/s13102-022-00409-1.

Effectiveness of wearable devices as a support strategy for maintaining physical activity after a structured exercise intervention for employees with metabolic syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations

Effectiveness of wearable devices as a support strategy for maintaining physical activity after a structured exercise intervention for employees with metabolic syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

Pauline Bayerle et al. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. .

Abstract

Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular events and high socioeconomic costs. Despite lifestyle interventions focusing on exercise are effective strategies to improve parameters of the above aspects, many programs fail to show sustained effects in the long-term.

Methods: At visit 2 (V2) 129 company employees with diagnosed MetS, who previously participated in a 6-month telemonitoring-supported exercise intervention, were randomized into three subgroups for a 6-month maintenance treatment phase. A wearable activity device was provided to subgroup A and B to assess and to track physical activity. Further subgroup A attended personal consultations with individual instructions for exercise activities. Subgroup C received neither technical nor personal support. 6 months later at visit (V3), changes in exercise capacity, MetS severity, work ability, health-related quality of life and anxiety and depression were compared between the subgroups with an analysis of variance with repeated measurements.

Results: The total physical activity (in MET*h/week) declined between visit 2 and visit 3 (subgroup A: V2: 48.0 ± 33.6, V3: 37.1 ± 23.0; subgroup B: V2: 52.6 ± 35.7, V3: 43.8 ± 40.7, subgroup C: V2: 51.5 ± 29.7, V3: 36.9 ± 22.8, for all p = 0.00) with no between-subgroup differences over time (p = 0.68). In all three subgroups the initial improvements in relative exercise capacity and MetS severity were maintained. Work ability declined significantly in subgroup C (V2: 40.3 ± 5.0, V3: 39.1 ± 5.7; p < 0.05), but remained stable in the other subgroups with no between-subgroup differences over time (p = 0.38). Health-related quality of life and anxiety and depression severity also showed no significant differences over time.

Conclusions: Despite the maintenance of physical activity could not be achieved, most of the health related outcomes remained stable and above baseline value, with no difference regarding the support strategy during the maintenance treatment phase. Trial registration The study was completed as a cooperation project between the Volkswagen AG and the Hannover Medical School (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02029131).

Keywords: Company employees; Maintenance; Metabolic syndrome; Physical activity; Sustainability; Telemonitoring; Wearable device; Work ability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Allocation of participants at maintenance treatment phase including dropouts
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
ad Relative exercise capacity (a), total PA (b), WAItotal (c) and MetS-z-score (d) in the whole intervention group across baseline, visit 2 and visit 3, and in the subgroups A, B and C across the maintenance phase from visit 2 to visit 3. Relative exercise capacity (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.46), total PA (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.24) and WAItotal (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.18) increased significantly across the three time points, respectively decreased for MetS-z-score (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.23). WAI work ability index, PA physical activity

References

    1. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific statement: executive summary. Circulation. 2005;112(17):e285. - PubMed
    1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF consensus worldwide definition of the metabolic syndrome. 2020. https://www.idf.org/component/attachments/attachments.html?id=705&task=d....
    1. Schultz AB, Edington DW. Analysis of the association between metabolic syndrome and disease in a workplace population over time. Value Health. 2010;13(2):258–264. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00651.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. IDF DIABETES ATLAS 9th edn. https://www.diabetesatlas.org/en/. Accessed 15 June 2021.
    1. Dekker JM, Girman C, Rhodes T, Nijpels G, Stehouwer CDA, Bouter LM, et al. Metabolic syndrome and 10-year cardiovascular disease risk in the Hoorn study. Circulation. 2005;112(5):666–673. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.516948. - DOI - PubMed

Associated data