Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2022 Feb 15;79(6):530-541.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.11.042.

Discordance Between Standard Equations for Determination of LDL Cholesterol in Patients With Atherosclerosis

Affiliations
Free article
Multicenter Study

Discordance Between Standard Equations for Determination of LDL Cholesterol in Patients With Atherosclerosis

Aparna Sajja et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: Accurate estimation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is important for guiding cholesterol-lowering therapy. Different methods currently exist to estimate LDL-C.

Objectives: This study sought to assess discordance of estimated LDL-C using the Friedewald, Sampson, and Martin/Hopkins equations.

Methods: Electronic health record data from patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and triglyceride (TG) levels of <400 mg/dL between October 1, 2015, and June 30, 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. LDL-C was estimated using the Friedewald, Sampson, and Martin/Hopkins equations. Patients were categorized as concordant if LDL-C was <70 mg/dL with each pairwise comparison of equations and as discordant if LDL-C was <70 mg/dL for the index equation and ≥70 mg/dL for the comparator.

Results: The study included 146,106 patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (mean age: 68 years; 56% male; 91% White). The Martin/Hopkins equation consistently estimated higher LDL-C values than the Friedewald and Sampson equations. Discordance rates were 15% for the Friedewald vs Martin/Hopkins comparison, 9% for the Friedewald vs Sampson comparison, and 7% for the Sampson vs Martin/Hopkins comparison. Discordance increased at lower LDL-C cutpoints and in those with elevated TG levels. Among patients with TG levels of ≥150 mg/dL, a >10 mg/dL difference in LDL-C was present in 67%, 27%, and 23% of patients when comparing the Friedewald vs Martin/Hopkins, Friedewald vs Sampson, and Sampson vs Martin/Hopkins equations, respectively.

Conclusions: Clinically meaningful differences in estimated LDL-C exist among equations, particularly at TG levels of ≥150 mg/dL and/or lower LDL-C levels. Reliance on the Friedewald and Sampson equations may result in the underestimation and undertreatment of LDL-C in those at increased risk.

Keywords: Friedewald equation; LDL-C; Martin/Hopkins equation; Sampson equation; atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Virani has received grant support from the Department of Veterans Affairs, World Heart Federation, and Tahir and Jooma Family; and has received honorarium from the American College of Cardiology (as associate editor for Innovations, acc.org). Dr Martin has received research support from the American Heart Association, PCORI (Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute), National Institutes of Health, the David and June Trone Family Foundation, and Pollin Digital Health Innovation Fund; has served as a consultant for AstraZeneca, DalCor Pharmaceuticals, 89bio, Amgen, Esperion, iHealth, Kaneka, and Sanofi; has a patent pending for a system, of which he is a coinventor, to estimate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels; and is a founder of and holds equity in Corrie Health, which intends to further develop the platform. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources