Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;7(2):e008096.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008096.

A framework for the promotion of ethical benefit sharing in health research

Affiliations

A framework for the promotion of ethical benefit sharing in health research

Anja Bedeker et al. BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

There is an increasing recognition of the importance of including benefit sharing in research programmes in order to ensure equitable and just distribution of the benefits arising from research. Whilst there are global efforts to promote benefit sharing when using non-human biological resources, benefit sharing plans and implementation do not yet feature prominently in research programmes, funding applications or requirements by ethics review boards. Whilst many research stakeholders may agree with the concept of benefit sharing, it can be difficult to operationalise benefit sharing within research programmes. We present a framework designed to assist with identifying benefit sharing opportunities in research programmes. The framework has two dimensions: the first represents microlevel, mesolevel and macrolevel stakeholders as defined using a socioecological model; and the second identifies nine different types of benefit sharing that might be achieved during a research programme. We provide an example matrix identifying different types of benefit sharing that might be undertaken during genomics research, and present a case study evaluating benefit sharing in Africa during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. This framework, with examples, is intended as a practical tool to assist research stakeholders with identifying opportunities for benefit sharing, and inculcating intentional benefit sharing in their research programmes from inception.

Keywords: public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Outline of the socioecological model, with examples of stakeholders and corresponding Sustainable Development Goals.

References

    1. Rice TW. The historical, ethical, and legal background of human-subjects research. Respir Care. 2008;53:1325–9. - PubMed
    1. Human Genome Organization Ethics Committee Genetic benefit sharing. Science. 2000;290:49. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5450.49. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hurst DJ. Benefit sharing in a global context: working towards solutions for implementation. Dev World Bioeth. 2017;17:70–6. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12118. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dauda B, Dierickx K. Benefit sharing: an exploration on the contextual discourse of a changing concept. BMC Med Ethics. 2013;14:36. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-36. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dauda B, Denier Y, Dierickx K. What do the various principles of justice mean within the concept of benefit sharing? J Bioeth Inq. 2016;13:281–93. doi: 10.1007/s11673-016-9706-4. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types