Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan 12:21:250-268.
doi: 10.17179/excli2021-4094. eCollection 2022.

Prognostic significance and therapeutic potentials of immune checkpoints in osteosarcoma

Affiliations
Review

Prognostic significance and therapeutic potentials of immune checkpoints in osteosarcoma

Vafa Meftahpour et al. EXCLI J. .

Abstract

Although there exist manifold strategies for cancer treatment, researchers are obliged to develop novel treatments based on the challenges that arise. One of these recent treatment approaches is cancer immunotherapy, which enjoys various types of strategies itself. However, one of the most significant methods, in this regard, is employing immune checkpoint proteins (ICPs). Bone sarcomas have several subtypes, with the most common ones being chordoma, chondrosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and osteosarcoma. Although many aggressive treatment approaches, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgical resection, have been employed over the last decades, significantly improved outcomes have not been observed for Ewing sarcoma or osteosarcoma patients. Additionally, chordoma and chdrosarcoma resist against both radiation and chemotherapy. Accordingly, elucidating how recent therapies could affect bone sarcomas is necessary. Checkpoint inhibitors have attracted great attention for the treatment of several cancer types, including bone sarcoma. Herein, the recent advances of current immune checkpoint targets, such as anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 blockade, for the treatment of bone sarcoma have been reviewed.

Keywords: immune checkpoints; osteosarcoma; therapeutic potentials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Table 1
Table 1. Clinical trials for osteosarcoma by checkpoint inhibitor

References

    1. Abdel-Rahman O. Immune checkpoints aberrations and gastric cancer;assessment of prognostic value and evaluation of therapeutic potentials. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;97:65–71. - PubMed
    1. Aghebati-Maleki A, Nami S, Baghbanzadeh A, Karzar BH, Noorolyai S, Fotouhi A, et al. Implications of exosomes as diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:21694–21706. - PubMed
    1. Aleixo PB, Hartmann AA, Menezes IC, Meurer RT, Oliveira AM. Can MDM2 and CDK4 make the diagnosis of well differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma? An immunohistochemical study on 129 soft tissue tumours. J Clin Pathol. 2009;62:1127–35. - PubMed
    1. Boehm U, Klamp T, Groot M, Howard JC. Cellular responses to interferon-gamma. Annu Rev Immunol. 1997;15:749–795. - PubMed
    1. Champiat S, Dercle L, Ammari S, Massard C, Hollebecque A, Postel-Vinay S, et al. Hyperprogressive disease is a new pattern of progression in cancer patients treated by anti-PD-1/PD-L1. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:1920–8. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources