Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 25:13:802123.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.802123. eCollection 2022.

Methylxanthine Treatment in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in China: A Real-World Study Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Affiliations

Methylxanthine Treatment in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in China: A Real-World Study Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Zijie Zhan et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Background: Although medical guidelines discourage the use of methylxanthines in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), they are still widely used in clinical practice. This study investigated the real-world use of methylxanthines in the management of AECOPD. Methods: Patient data from the Acute exacerbation of Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Using REgistry data (ACURE, NCT02657525) study database were screened. Enrolled patients were divided into treatment and control groups. Propensity score (PS) matching and Cox regression analyses were used to minimize confounding factors and determine the association between methylxanthine treatment and the length of stay (LOS). Results: Among the 2088 eligible patients, 1,563 (74.9%) were in the methylxanthine treatment group. Patients treated with methylxanthines had more severe respiratory symptoms and worse lung function than those in the control group. Doxophylline was the most commonly used methylxanthine in both secondary and tertiary hospitals. After PS matching, 966 patients were equally divided into two groups. The LOS of patients in the two groups was similar [median: 8 days, interquartile range (IQR): 7-11 days, p = 0.730]. Patients in the treatment group (median: 8, IQR: 4-12) had a more significant decrease in the COPD Assessment Test score from admission to discharge than those in the control group (median: 6, IQR: 2-10, p < 0.001). Among all matched patients, the LOS was not significantly associated with methylxanthine treatment [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.02, 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 0.89-1.16]. However, in the subgroup analysis, methylxanthines were significantly associated with a short LOS in patients with blood eosinophil count >4% (adjusted HR: 1.56, 95% CIs: 1.12-2.17). Conclusion: This study revealed that methylxanthines, especially doxophylline, are widely used in China. Methylxanthines were effective in improving symptoms in AECOPD patients. Higher blood eosinophil count may be associated with a better efficacy of methylxanthine treatment.

Keywords: acute exacerbation; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; hospitalization; length of stay; methylxanthine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The flowchart of patient enrollment process. AECOPD, acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, FEV1/FVC, forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The distribution of methylxanthines used in two hospital levels.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
The association between LOS and methylxanthines use in subgroups of matched cohort. Variables increase the length of stay if HR < 1, whereas variables reduce the length of stay if HR > 1.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bafadhel M., Pavord I. D., Russell R. E. K. (2017). Eosinophils in COPD: Just Another Biomarker?. Lancet Respir. Med. 5, 747–759. 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30217-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bafadhel M., Peterson S., De Blas M. A., Calverley P. M., Rennard S. I., Richter K., et al. (2018). Predictors of Exacerbation Risk and Response to Budesonide in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a post-hoc Analysis of Three Randomised Trials. Lancet Respir. Med. 6, 117–126. 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30006-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barnes P. J. (2019). Inflammatory Endotypes in COPD. Allergy 74, 1249–1256. 10.1111/all.13760 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barnes P. J. (2013). Theophylline. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 188 (8), 901–906. 10.1164/rccm.201302-0388pp - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barr R. G., Rowe B. H., Camargo C. A., Jr (2003). Methylxanthines for Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials. BMJ 327 (7416), 643. 10.1136/bmj.327.7416.643 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources