Two-Year Follow-Up on Return to Work in a Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Brief and Multidisciplinary Intervention in Employees on Sick Leave Due to Low Back Pain
- PMID: 35147899
- DOI: 10.1007/s10926-022-10030-1
Two-Year Follow-Up on Return to Work in a Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Brief and Multidisciplinary Intervention in Employees on Sick Leave Due to Low Back Pain
Abstract
Purpose: To study return to work (RTW) at 2-year follow-up in a randomised controlled trial comparing brief intervention (BI) and multidisciplinary intervention (MDI) in employees on sick leave due to low back pain (LBP) stratified for job relations.
Methods: In total 476 employees on sick leave for 4-12 weeks due to LBP were divided into strata with weak or strong job relations, based on perceived risk of losing job and influence on job planning. In each stratum participants were allocated to BI or MDI. All participants received BI, i.e. a clinical examination by a rheumatologist and physiotherapist. In addition, MDI involved a case manager who made a rehabilitation plan in collaboration with the participant. The primary outcome was time to RTW. Secondary outcomes were median weeks in different employment status and selfreported pain, disability and psychological health. Sustained RTW was estimated by work status the last 4 weeks before the 2-year date.
Results: Participants with strong job relations who received BI had a higher RTW rate (hazard ratio = 0.74 (95% CI 0.57; 0.96)) and spent more weeks working than participants who received MDI. In the stratum of weak job relations, no difference was seen regarding RTW and weeks working. For health-related outcomes and sustained RTW no significant results were found in neither stratum.
Conclusions: Employees with strong job relations achieved higher RTW rates when receiving BI compared to MDI, while no difference was found between intervention groups for employees with weak job relations.
Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN14136384. Registered 4 August.
Keywords: Low back pain; Multidisciplinary intervention; Rehabilitation; Return to work; Sick leave; Vocational rehabilitation.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, et al. (2014) The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:968–74. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, et al. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396:P2006-2017. - DOI
-
- Hoy D, Brooks P, Blyth F, et al. The epidemiology of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24:769–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2010.10.002 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Gordon W. The back pain revolution. 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2007.
-
- Valentin GH, Pilegaard MS, Vaegter HB, et al. Prognostic factors for disability and sick leave in patients with subacute non-malignant pain: a systematic review of cohort studies. BMJ Open. 2016;6: e007616. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007616 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
