Impact of microprocessor prosthetic knee on mobility and quality of life in patients with lower limb amputation: a systematic review of the literature
- PMID: 35148043
- PMCID: PMC9987462
- DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07238-0
Impact of microprocessor prosthetic knee on mobility and quality of life in patients with lower limb amputation: a systematic review of the literature
Abstract
Introduction: Advanced technologies have made available the development of microprocessor prosthetic knee (MPK) to improve autonomy of patients with lower limb amputation. In the present systematic review, we aimed to evaluate the impact of the use of all types of MPK on patients' functional status and quality of life.
Evidence acquisition: We conducted this review according to the PRISMA Guidelines on Medline (via Ovid), Scopus and SportDiscuss. All identified articles were screened for their eligibility by two reviewers using Covidence software. The Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) or the NIH Quality Assessment Tool were used to assess the quality of the studies.
Evidence synthesis: Eighteen articles were included in the present review (7 randomized controlled trials - RCT), 6 cross-sectional and 5 follow-up studies). Number of participants included varied from 20 to 602, protocols' length varied from a single session to 12 weeks of use of MPK. Taken together, MPK users compared to NMPK users tend to present better functional status and mobility. Quality of life was also positively impacted in MPK users. On the other hand, the superiority of more advanced MPKs such as the Genium® is less clear, especially given the improvements over time of other MPKs such as the C-leg® and the Rheo knee®.
Conclusions: Based on our results, while it is clear that MPKs outperform NMPKs both for functional status and quality of life, additional benefits of one MPK over another is less clear. Future studies are needed to clarify these aspects.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Miller WC, Speechley M, Deathe B. The prevalence and risk factors of falling and fear of falling among lower extremity amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1031–7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&l... 10.1053/apmr.2001.24295 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Pezzin LE, Dillingham TR, MacKenzie EJ. Rehabilitation and the long-term outcomes of persons with trauma-related amputations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:292–300. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&l... 10.1016/S0003-9993(00)90074-1 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sinha R. Rehabilitation WVDH-D and, 2011 undefined. A systematic literature review of quality of life in lower limb amputees. Taylor Fr 2011;33:883–99. - PubMed
-
- Chen MC, Lee SS, Hsieh YL, Wu SJ, Lai CS, Lin SD. Influencing factors of outcome after lower-limb amputation: a five-year review in a plastic surgical department. Ann Plast Surg 2008;61:314–8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&l... 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181571379 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sawers AB, Hafner BJ. Outcomes associated with the use of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees among individuals with unilateral transfemoral limb loss: a systematic review. J Rehabil Res Dev 2013;50:273–314. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&l... 10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0187 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical