Treatment of nonsurgical refractory back pain with high-frequency spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz: 12-month results of a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 35148512
- DOI: 10.3171/2021.12.SPINE211301
Treatment of nonsurgical refractory back pain with high-frequency spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz: 12-month results of a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) at 10 kHz (10-kHz SCS) is a safe and effective therapy for treatment of chronic low-back pain. However, it is unclear from existing evidence whether these findings can be generalized to patients with chronic back pain that is refractory to conventional medical management (CMM) and who have no history of spine surgery and are not acceptable candidates for spine surgery. The authors have termed this condition "nonsurgical refractory back pain" (NSRBP) and conducted a multicenter, randomized controlled trial to compare CMM with and without 10-kHz SCS in this population.
Methods: Patients with NSRBP, as defined above and with a spine surgeon consultation required for confirmation, were randomized 1:1 to patients undergoing CMM with and without 10-kHz SCS. CMM included nonsurgical treatment for back pain, according to physicians' best practices and clinical guidelines. Primary and secondary endpoints included the responder rate (≥ 50% pain relief), disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), global impression of change, quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), and change in daily opioid use and were analyzed 3 and 6 months after randomization. The protocol allowed for an optional crossover at 6 months for both arms, with observational follow-up over 12 months.
Results: In total, 159 patients were randomized; 76 received CMM, and 69 (83.1%) of the 83 patients who were assigned to the 10-kHz SCS group received a permanent implant. At the 3-month follow-up, 80.9% of patients who received stimulation and 1.3% of those who received CMM were found to be study responders (primary outcome, ≥ 50% pain relief; p < 0.001). There was also a significant difference between the treatment groups in all secondary outcomes at 6 months (p < 0.001). In the 10-kHz SCS arm, outcomes were sustained, including a mean 10-cm visual analog scale score of 2.1 ± 2.3 and 2.1 ± 2.2 and mean ODI score of 24.1 ± 16.1 and 24.0 ± 17.0 at 6 and 12 months, respectively (p = 0.9). In the CMM arm, 74.7% (56/75) of patients met the criteria for crossover and received an implant. The crossover arm obtained a 78.2% responder rate 6 months postimplantation. Five serious adverse events occurred (procedure-related, of 125 total permanent implants), all of which resolved without sequelae.
Conclusions: The study results, which included follow-up over 12 months, provide important insights into the durability of 10-kHz SCS therapy with respect to chronic refractory back pain, physical function, quality of life, and opioid use, informing the current clinical practice for pain management in patients with NSRBP.
Keywords: 10-kHz SCS; high-frequency; low-back pain; lumbar; nonsurgical refractory back pain; pain management; spinal cord stimulation.
Similar articles
-
Demographics and PainDETECT as Predictors of 24-Month Outcomes for 10 kHz SCS in Nonsurgical Refractory Back Pain.Pain Physician. 2024 Mar;27(3):129-139. Pain Physician. 2024. PMID: 38506680
-
High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at 10 kHz for the Treatment of Nonsurgical Refractory Back Pain: Design of a Pragmatic, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.Pain Pract. 2021 Feb;21(2):171-183. doi: 10.1111/papr.12945. Epub 2020 Sep 26. Pain Pract. 2021. PMID: 33463027 Free PMC article.
-
Durable responses at 24 months with high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for nonsurgical refractory back pain.J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Nov 17;40(2):229-239. doi: 10.3171/2023.9.SPINE23504. Print 2024 Feb 1. J Neurosurg Spine. 2023. PMID: 37976509 Clinical Trial.
-
Pain relief and improvement in quality of life with 10 kHz SCS therapy: Summary of clinical evidence.CNS Neurosci Ther. 2020 Apr;26(4):403-415. doi: 10.1111/cns.13285. Epub 2020 Feb 22. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2020. PMID: 32087613 Free PMC article. Review.
-
10 kHz spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and/or leg pain: Summary of clinical studies.SAGE Open Med. 2020 Aug 20;8:2050312120951369. doi: 10.1177/2050312120951369. eCollection 2020. SAGE Open Med. 2020. PMID: 32913650 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Objective wearable measures correlate with self-reported chronic pain levels in people with spinal cord stimulation systems.NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Aug 15;6(1):146. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00892-x. NPJ Digit Med. 2023. PMID: 37582839 Free PMC article.
-
Neuromodulation Therapy for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review.Biomedicines. 2022 Aug 7;10(8):1909. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10081909. Biomedicines. 2022. PMID: 36009456 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evidence-based consensus guidelines on patient selection and trial stimulation for spinal cord stimulation therapy for chronic non-cancer pain.Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Jun;48(6):273-287. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-104097. Epub 2023 Mar 30. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023. PMID: 37001888 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Rates and Causes of Reoperations Following Spinal Cord Stimulation Within a 2-12 year Period.Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):467-473. doi: 10.1177/21925682231194466. Epub 2023 Aug 5. Global Spine J. 2025. PMID: 37542526 Free PMC article.
-
A single-center real-world review of 10 kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation outcomes for treatment of chronic pain.Interv Pain Med. 2024 Mar 11;3(1):100402. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100402. eCollection 2024 Mar. Interv Pain Med. 2024. PMID: 39239496 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous