Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Oct 1;33(7):e680-e685.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008539. Epub 2022 Feb 10.

A Comparative Study of Analog Preoperative Planning Versus Virtual Preoperative Planning for Mandibular Reconstruction With Fibula Free Flap

Affiliations
Review

A Comparative Study of Analog Preoperative Planning Versus Virtual Preoperative Planning for Mandibular Reconstruction With Fibula Free Flap

Marco Cedillo et al. J Craniofac Surg. .

Abstract

Mandibular reconstruction is a challenging procedure, especially in cancer patients with defects that are greater than 6 cm. Free vascularized fibular flap is the gold standard treatment in these cases since it allows three-dimensional restoration of the lost segments after ablative surgery in addition to providing the possibility of a subsequent implant-supported rehabilitation improving the functional and aesthetic outcomes of the surgery.To obtain accurate results, preoperative planning must be done with detail. Approaches for the preoperative planning include both the conventional analog planning and the virtual planning that are valid alternatives in meeting the trans-surgical requirements.This study makes a comparative analysis of 2 clinical cases with a diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma that were reconstructed using a vascularized fibular free flap. The first case was planned using the conventional analog method whereas the second case was planned using the virtual planning approach.The impact of virtual planning and conventional analog planning on preoperative planning time, ischemia period, and total surgical time is analyzed according to the experience obtained in the cases presented. In addition, the authors described the technique used for each planning method along with a literature review in which the results are contrasted and discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Naval G, Gonzáles GR. Colgajo libre microvascularizado de peroné en la reconstructión de defectos mandibulares. Reconstruction Maxilomandibular Compleja . Madrid - Espana: Editorial Medica Panamericana; 2012:, 73–81
    1. Damecourt A, Nieto N, Galmiche S, et al. In-house 3D treatment planning for mandibular reconstruction by free fibula flap in cancer: Our technique. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2020;137:501–505
    1. Blanc J, Fuchsmann C, Nistiriuc-Muntean V, et al. Evaluation of virtual surgical planning systems and customized devices in fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 2019;276:3477–3486
    1. Froget N, Pierrefeu A, Koppe M, et al. Bone reconstruction in irradiated situations. Preprosthetic and Maxillofacial Surgery. Lyon, France: Woodhead Publishing Limited; 2011:, 264–283
    1. Patel SY, Kim DD, Ghali GE. Maxillofacial reconstruction using vascularized fibula free flaps and endosseous implants. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2019;31:259–284

LinkOut - more resources