Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr:117:287-294.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.02.009. Epub 2022 Feb 9.

Performance of anterior nares and tongue swabs for nucleic acid, Nucleocapsid, and Spike antigen testing for detecting SARS-CoV-2 against nasopharyngeal PCR and viral culture

Michalina A Montaño  1 , Meagan J Bemer  2 , Kate B Heller  2 , Allison Meisner  3 , Zarna Marfatia  2 , Elena A Rechkina  2 , Leah R Padgett  4 , Charlotte L Ahls  4 , Douglas Rains  4 , Linhui Hao  5 , Tien-Ying Hsiang  5 , Gerard A Cangelosi  6 , Alexander L Greninger  7 , Jason L Cantera  8 , Allison Golden  8 , Roger B Peck  8 , David S Boyle  8 , Michael Gale Jr  5 , Paul K Drain  2
Affiliations

Performance of anterior nares and tongue swabs for nucleic acid, Nucleocapsid, and Spike antigen testing for detecting SARS-CoV-2 against nasopharyngeal PCR and viral culture

Michalina A Montaño et al. Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: This study assesses and compares the performance of different swab types and specimen collection sites for SARS-CoV-2 testing, to reference standard real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and viral culture.

Methods: Symptomatic adults with COVID-19 who visited routine COVID-19 testing sites used spun polyester and FLOQSwabs to self-collect specimens from the anterior nares and tongue. We evaluated the self-collected specimen from anterior nares and tongue swabs for the nucleocapsid (N) or spike (S) antigen of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR and then compared these results with results from RT-PCR and viral cultures from nurse-collected nasopharyngeal swabs.

Results: Diagnostic sensitivity was highest for RT-PCR testing conducted using specimens from the anterior nares collected on FLOQSwabs (84%; 95% CI 68-94%) and spun polyester swabs (82%; 95% CI 66-92%), compared to RT-PCR tests conducted using specimens from nasopharyngeal swabs. Relative to viral culture from nasopharyngeal swabs, diagnostic sensitivities were higher for RT-PCR and antigen testing of anterior nares swabs (91-100%) than that of tongue swabs (18-81%). Antigen testing of anterior nares swabs had higher sensitivities against viral culture (91%) than against nasopharyngeal RT-PCR (38-70%). All investigational tests had high specificity compared with nasopharyngeal RT-PCR. Spun polyester swabs are equally effective as FLOQSwabs for anterior nasal RT-PCR testing.

Conclusions: We found that anterior nares specimens were more sensitive than tongue swab specimens or antigen testing for detecting SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. Thus, self-collected anterior nares specimens may represent an alternative method for diagnostic SARS-CoV-2 testing in some settings.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; antigen detection; diagnostic performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
NP RT-PCR Ct value versus days since symptom onset for symptomatic participants with an NP RT-PCR result (n=249). Abbreviations: NP = nasopharyngeal; PCR = polymerase chain reaction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
NP swab Ct value versus qualitative intervention test result. Ct values and qualitative intervention test result of all samples that were positive by NP RT-PCR. Plots are organized by sample site (anterior nares vs tongue), and intervention test (N antigen, S antigen, FLOQSwab PCR, spun polyester PCR). Black lines indicate median Ct values. To improve visibility of plots, randomized jitter of 0.15 was added in the direction of the x-axis. Abbreviations: Ct = cycle threshold; N = nucleocapsid; NP = nasopharyngeal; PCR = polymerase chain reaction; RT-PCR = reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction; S = spike.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bullard J., Dust K., Funk D., Strong J.E., Alexander D., Garnett L.…Poliquin G. Predicting Infectious Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 From Diagnostic Samples. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(10):2663–2666. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa638. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheng M.P., Papenburg J., Desjardins M., Kanjilal S., Quach C., Libman M.…Yansouni C.P. Diagnostic Testing for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Coronavirus 2: A Narrative Review. Ann Intern Med. 2020;172(11):726–734. doi: 10.7326/m20-1301. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clopper C.J., Pearson E.S. The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. Biometrika. 1934;26(4):404–413. doi: 10.1093/biomet/26.4.404. - DOI
    1. Debad J., Glezer E., Wohlstadter J., Sigal G. Electrogenerated chemiluminescence. Marcel Dekker; New York, NY: 2004. Clinical and biological applications of ECL; pp. 43–78.
    1. FDA. (2020). Food and Drug Administration COVID19 FAQs website. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/coronavirus-covid-19-and-medical-dev...