Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Jun;29(3):437-448.
doi: 10.1007/s10140-022-02021-9. Epub 2022 Feb 12.

Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosing acute appendicitis in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Maryam Nakhaie Moghadam  1 , Morteza Salarzaei  2 , Zahra Shahraki  3
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosing acute appendicitis in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Maryam Nakhaie Moghadam et al. Emerg Radiol. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Lack of timely diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) can lead to perforation and peritonitis, which might be associated with complications such as miscarriage, preterm delivery, fetal loss, and even maternal mortality. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonography (US) for diagnosing AA in pregnant patients.

Methods: We performed the present systematic review and meta-analysis based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Using a pre-designed standard datasheet, the two authors summarized the data of each study independently. Pregnant women with diagnosed or suspected AA, who have undergone ultrasonography, as well as using CT scan or surgery as the standard method, were included.

Results: A total of 8 studies consisting of 1593 patients were included. The main analysis showed that the overall sensitivity and specificity were 77.6% and 75.3% for US in diagnosing AA in pregnancy. The sensitivity of US in the first, second, and third trimesters of pregnancy were 69%, 63%, and 51%, respectively. While the corresponding figures for specificity were 85%, 85%, and 65%. There was a significant difference in the diagnostic performance of US between the first two trimesters and the third one. The DORs in these three trimesters were 36, 26, and 1.92, respectively.

Conclusions: Ultrasound evaluation showed a low diagnostic accuracy for acute appendicitis in pregnant women, especially during the third trimester. These patients should be diagnosed early and accurately to prevent both complications and unnecessary operations. It can be recommended to consider alternative imaging, mostly after negative or uncertain US.

Keywords: Acute appendicitis; Pregnancy; Ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Akbulut S, Koc C, Kocaaslan H, Gonultas F, Samdanci E, Yologlu S et al (2019) Comparison of clinical and histopathological features of patients who underwent incidental or emergency appendectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 11:19–26 - PubMed - PMC
    1. Emre A, Akbulut S, Bozdag Z, Yilmaz M, Kanlioz M, Emre R et al (2013) Routine histopathologic examination of appendectomy specimens: retrospective analysis of 1255 patients. Int Surg 98:354–362 - PubMed - PMC
    1. Andersson RE, Lambe M (2001) Incidence of appendicitis during pregnancy. Int J Epidemiol 30:1281–1285 - PubMed
    1. Aras A, Karaman E, Pekşen Ç, Kızıltan R, Kotan MÇ (1992) The diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant versus non-pregnant women: a comparative study. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2016(62):622–627
    1. McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Tillou A, Hiatt JR, Ko CY, Cryer HM (2007) Negative appendectomy in pregnant women is associated with a substantial risk of fetal loss. J Am Coll Surg 205(4):534–540 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources