Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of the level of ligation of inferior mesenteric artery on functional outcomes in rectal cancer surgery
- PMID: 35152339
- DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04101-1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of the level of ligation of inferior mesenteric artery on functional outcomes in rectal cancer surgery
Abstract
Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis studied the role of high (HL) versus low (LL) inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) ligation on genitourinary and defecatory dysfunction in patients who had undergone resection for rectal cancer (RC).
Methods: A systematic literature search of four major databases was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HL and LL of IMA in RC surgery were identified. Those studies that looked at genitourinary or defecatory dysfunction were included. Random-effects modeling to summarize statistics was performed. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk-of-Bias tool 2.
Results: Three RCTs were included. There was clinical heterogeneity with regard to cancer stage and location as well as operative techniques and adjuvant treatments. Functional outcomes (FO) that were reported by at least two studies were International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ), International Index for Erectile Function (IIEF), Jorge-Wexner incontinence score (J-W). Difference was observed in ICIQ at 9 months after surgery favoring LL (standard mean difference: - 0.66; 95% confidence intervals (CI): - 0.92, - 0.40; P = 0.37; I 2 = 0%). Difference was also observed in IIEF at 9 months favoring LL (mean difference: 7.43; CI: 1.86, 13.00; P = 0.16; I 2 = 50%).
Conclusions: Although our study has demonstrated the superiority of LL in genitourinary function preservation, these results should be taken with consciousness due to significant heterogeneity between included studies, small sample size, and potential bias. More high-quality studies are needed.
Prospero: CRD4202121099 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021210998.
Keywords: Anterior resection of the rectum; Artery ligation; Inferior mesenteric artery; Laparoscopic; Rectal cancer; Total mesorectal excision.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Yang Y, Wang G, He J, Zhang J, Xi J, Wang F (2018) High tie versus low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg 52:20–24 - DOI
-
- Yasuda K, Kawai K, Ishihara S, Murono K, Otani K, Nishikawa T, Tanaka T, Kiyomatsu T, Hata K, Nozawa H, Yamaguchi H, Aoki S, Mishima H, Maruyama T, Sako A, Watanabe T (2016) Level of arterial ligation in sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg Oncol 14:99 - DOI
-
- Zhang C, Chen L, Cui M, Xing J, Yang H, Yao Z, Zhang N, Tan F, Liu M, Xu K, Su X (2020) Short- and long-term outcomes of rectal cancer patients with high or improved low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery. Sci Rep 10:15339 - DOI
-
- Bertrand MM, Delmond L, Mazars R, Ripoche J, Macri F, Prudhomme M (2014) Is low tie ligation truly reproducible in colorectal cancer surgery? Anatomical study of the inferior mesenteric artery division branches. Surg Radiol Anat 36:1057–1062 - DOI
-
- Lowry AC, Simmang CL, Boulos P, Farmer KC, Finan PJ, Hyman N, Killingback M, Lubowski DZ, Moore R, Penfold C, Savoca P, Stitz R, Tjandra JJ (2001) Consensus statement of definitions for anorectal physiology and rectal cancer: report of the Tripartite Consensus Conference on Definitions for Anorectal Physiology and Rectal Cancer, Washington, D.C., May 1, 1999. Dis Colon Rectum 44:915–919
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources