Factors affecting biomechanical strength of Latarjet constructs: A systematic review and meta-regression
- PMID: 35154396
- PMCID: PMC8832702
- DOI: 10.1177/1758573220960462
Factors affecting biomechanical strength of Latarjet constructs: A systematic review and meta-regression
Abstract
Background: The Latarjet procedure reduces recurrent glenohumeral instability but has potential hardware and graft complications. The procedure has been modified to use various screw types as well as suture buttons. Biomechanical studies have evaluated the effect of these implants on construct strength. With varying results it is unclear whether there is an optimal implant to use.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review of human cadaveric biomechanical studies evaluating Latarjet ultimate failure load. Two independent reviewers screened articles and included them after full text review. Additional factors including implants used, graft orientation, cortices engaged, drill diameter, and screw characteristics were recorded. Meta-regression was performed on the 145 specimens from eight studies that met inclusion criteria.
Results: Screw fixation resulted in a 396.8 N (95% CI, 149.8-643.7) N higher ultimate failure load against shear stresses than suture buttons (p = 0.002). There were no differences between implants for ultimate failure load against tensile forces. Tensile strength was significantly affected by drill diameter with each millimeter of increase reducing the mean ultimate failure load by 127.4 N (95% CI, 41.2-213.6) N (p = 0.004).
Conclusions: These results suggest that using screw fixation and minimizing drill diameter can obtain the maximum ultimate failure load against both shear and tensile forces in a Latarjet construct.
Keywords: Latarjet; biomechanical strength; screw fixation; shoulder instability; suture button; ultimate failure load.
© 2020 The British Elbow & Shoulder Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Latarjet M. Treatment of recurrent dislocation of the shoulder. Lyon Chir 1954; 49: 994–997. - PubMed
-
- Boileau P, Villalba M, Héry JY, et al. Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 1755–1763. - PubMed
-
- Burkhart SS, De Beer JF. Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy 2000; 16: 677–694. - PubMed
-
- Itoi E, Lee SB, Berglund LJ, et al. The effect of a glenoid defect on anteroinferior stability of the shoulder after Bankart repair: a cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82: 35–46. - PubMed
-
- Provencher MT, Ghodadra N, Romeo AA. Arthroscopic management of anterior instability: pearls, pitfalls, and lessons learned. Orthop Clin North Am 2010; 41: 325–337. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous