Does preservation of columns affect the medium-term outcome in distal humerus hemiarthroplasty for acute unreconstructable fractures?
- PMID: 35154409
- PMCID: PMC8832714
- DOI: 10.1177/1758573220977768
Does preservation of columns affect the medium-term outcome in distal humerus hemiarthroplasty for acute unreconstructable fractures?
Abstract
Background: We assessed distal humeral column preservation effects on clinical, radiographic and patient reported outcomes following distal humerus hemiarthroplasty for acute unreconstructable fractures.
Methods: Thirty-seven consecutive patients (mean age, 75; range, 29-93 years) with an average follow-up of 61 months (range, 24-105 months) after distal humerus hemiarthroplasty using a triceps preserving approach were studied. QuickDASH and Oxford Elbow Score assessed patient reported outcomes. Clinical and radiographic assessments comprised range of motion, grip strength, instability, implant loosening, chondral wear, heterotopic ossification and condylar union.
Results: Average QuickDASH was 14.9 (range, 0-63) and Oxford Elbow Score 40.35 (range, 25-48). Mean flexion arc was 108°, extension deficit 17° and pronosupination arc 155°. Average operative sided grip strength was 31.05 kg versus 31.13 kg contralaterally. Column preservation had no statistically significant effect on QuickDASH (p = 0.75), Oxford Elbow Score (p = 0.78), flexion-extension (p = 0.87), pronosupination (p = 0.78) or grip strength (p = 0.87). No progressive radiographic loosening or symptomatic chondral wear occurred. All fixed columns united. Three cases of immediate post-operative laxity fully resolved on elbow mobilisation. Four post-operative complications required further surgery: one ulnar neuropathy, one heterotopic ossification, one wound breakdown and one traumatic dislocation.
Conclusion: Medium-term outcome of distal humerus hemiarthroplasty for acute unreconstructable distal humeral fractures is reliable irrespective of condylar preservation.
Keywords: Distal humerus; arthroplasty; elbow; fracture; hemiarthroplasty.
© 2020 The British Elbow & Shoulder Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Anglen J. Distal humerus fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005; 13: 291–297. - PubMed
-
- Robinson CM, Hill RMF, Jacobs N, et al. Adult distal humeral metaphyseal fractures: epidemiology and results of treatment. J Orthop Trauma 2003; 17: 38–47. - PubMed
-
- Nauth A, McKee MD, Ristevski B, et al. Distal humeral fractures in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93: 686–700. - PubMed
-
- Prasad N, Ali A, Stanley D. Total elbow arthroplasty for non-rheumatoid patients with a fracture of the distal humerus: a minimum ten-year follow-up. Bone Joint J 2016; 98: 381–386. - PubMed
-
- McKee MD, Veillette CJ, Hall JA, et al. A multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial of open reduction – internal fixation versus total elbow arthroplasty for displaced intra-articular distal humerus fractures in elderly patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009; 18: 3–12. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources