Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;14(1):96-102.
doi: 10.1177/1758573220987843. Epub 2021 Jan 21.

A registry study on radial head arthroplasties in the Netherlands: Indications, types and short-term survival

Affiliations

A registry study on radial head arthroplasties in the Netherlands: Indications, types and short-term survival

Arno A Macken et al. Shoulder Elbow. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Background: This study aims to use the Dutch Arthroplasty Register data to report an overview of the contemporary indications and implant designs, and report the short-term survival of radial head arthroplasty.

Methods: From the Dutch Arthroplasty Register, data on patient demographics, surgery and revision were extracted for radial head arthroplasties performed from January 2014 to December 2019. Implant survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: Two hundred fifty-eight arthroplasties were included with a median follow-up of 2.2 years. The most common indication was a fracture of the radial head (178, 69%). One hundred thirty-nine (68%) of the prostheses were of bipolar design, and the most commonly used implant type was the Radial Head System (Tornier; 134, 51%). Of the 258 included radial head arthroplasties, 16 were revised at a median of six months after surgery. Reason for revision was predominantly aseptic loosening (9). The overall implant survival was 95.8% after one year, 90.5% after three years and 89.5% after five years.

Discussion: For radial head arthroplasties, acute trauma is the most common indication and Radial Head System the most commonly used implant. The implant survival is 89.5% after five years.

Keywords: Radial head; arthroplasty; implant design; indication; outcome; registry; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: DE reports consultancy for Lima corporates, has given paid presentations for AO and Stryker and received institutional support from Matthys, Zimmer-Biomet and Stryker. IO and KK received institutional support from Zimmer-Biomet and Stryker. AM, AP, AS and BT declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic illustration of a unipolar (a) and bipolar (b) design.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Implant survival estimate.

References

    1. Hotchkiss RN, Weiland AJ. Valgus stability of the elbow. J Orthop Res 1987; 5: 372–377. - PubMed
    1. Morrey BF, Chao EY, Hui FC. Biomechanical study of the elbow following excision of the radial head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979; 61: 63–68. - PubMed
    1. Ring D. Radial head fracture: open reduction-internal fixation or prosthetic replacement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011; 20: S107–S112. - PubMed
    1. Catellani F, De Caro F, De Biase CF, et al. Radial head resection versus arthroplasty in unrepairable comminuted fractures mason type III and type IV: a systematic review. BioMed Res Int 2018; 16: 4020625–4020625. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonnevialle N. Radial head replacement in adults with recent fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2016; 102: S69–S79. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources