Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec 29:12:e90.
doi: 10.34172/jlms.2021.90. eCollection 2021.

Exploring the Reversible Effects of UV Laser Radiation on the Gene Expression Profiles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Via Network Analysis

Affiliations

Exploring the Reversible Effects of UV Laser Radiation on the Gene Expression Profiles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Via Network Analysis

Reza Vafaee et al. J Lasers Med Sci. .

Abstract

Introduction: The reversibility of biological processes is an important challenge in the study of environmental pollutants and also natural and artificial radiation. There are many pieces of evidence about the reversible and irreversible effects of UV radiation on the human body. Assessment of the reversibility of UV laser effects on Saccharomyces cerevisiae was the aim of this study. Methods: Gene expression alteration in S. cerevisiae samples radiated by a 30s UV laser for 15, 30, and 60 minutes post-radiation times were investigated via network analysis to explore time-dependent reversible alteration in the gene expression profiles of the samples. Results: 19 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified as targeted genes for the samples which were harvested 60 minutes after radiation; network analysis revealed no significant alteration in biological processes. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the gross effects of the UV laser on S. cerevisiae samples disappear after 60 minutes of radiation.

Keywords: Network analysis; Post-radiation time; Radiation; Repair; Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 5

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jan H. HJ Genome maintence mechanisms for preventig cancer. Nature. 2001;411(6835):366–374. doi: 10.1038/35077232. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Basu AK. DNA damage, mutagenesis and cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(4):970. doi: 10.3390/ijms19040970. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Friedberg EC, Walker GC, Siede W, Wood RD, editors. DNA repair and mutagenesis. American Society for Microbiology Press; 2005.
    1. de Laat A, van Tilburg M, van der Leun JC, van Vloten WA, de Gruijl FR. Cell cycle kinetics following UVA irradiation in comparison to UVB and UVC irradiation. Photochem Photobiol. 1996;63(4):492–7. - PubMed
    1. Modenese A, Korpinen L, Gobba F. Solar radiation exposure and outdoor work: an underestimated occupational risk. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(10):2063. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102063. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources