Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan 5;7(1):226-236.
doi: 10.1002/lio2.720. eCollection 2022 Feb.

Cochlear implantation under local anesthetic: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Cochlear implantation under local anesthetic: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ben Walters et al. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. .

Abstract

Objectives: As the population ages and implantation criteria are relaxed, more patients with complex comorbidities are becoming eligible for cochlear implantation (CI). These patients have higher risks associated with general anesthesia. This systematic review assesses outcomes and complications following CI under local anesthetic to examine utility for patients deemed not suitable or at high risk for general anesthesia.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis performed according to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched were MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov. There were no limitations on year of publication or language.

Results: Then, 132 unique were identified. After screening abstracts and full texts for eligibility criteria a total of 18 articles were included. In the nine studies where audiological data were reported, all patients demonstrated improvement in audiological outcomes following implantation under local anesthetic (LA). Only minor complications of transient vertigo, wound infection, facial nerve paralysis, confusion, and tinnitus were reported but all were transient. Meta-analysis showed surgical time was significantly shorter under LA.

Conclusions: CI under LA is safe for patients with comorbidities which preclude them from general anesthesia, with minimal complications and an improved cost-effectiveness profile. However, larger scale, robust trials are required to assess this further.

Keywords: cochlear implantation; conscious sedation; local anesthetic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Medline search strategy
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
PRISMA flowchart
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Forest plot of operative time (min)
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Funnel plot of operative time in min. MD, mean difference; SE; standard error
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Risk of bias analysis

References

    1. World Health Organisation . Deafness and hearing loss [Internet]. 2021. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss.
    1. Lin FR, Chien WW, Li L, Clarrett DM, Niparko JK, Francis HW. Cochlear implantation in older adults. Medicine (Baltimore). 2012;91(5):229‐241. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deep NL, Connors J, Roland JT. Cochlear implantation under local anesthesia with conscious sedation in the elderly patient: focus on surgical technique. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;31(3):231‐237.
    1. Abelha FJ, Luís C, Veiga D, et al. Outcome and quality of life in patients with postoperative delirium during an ICU stay following major surgery. Crit Care. 2013;17(5):R257. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the lancet commission. The Lancet. 2020;396(10248):413‐446. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources