Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;4(3):72.
doi: 10.1007/s42452-022-04962-9. Epub 2022 Feb 5.

E-waste it wisely: lessons from Africa

Affiliations

E-waste it wisely: lessons from Africa

Thomas Maes et al. SN Appl Sci. 2022.

Abstract

E-waste is the world's fastest growing and most valuable domestic waste stream. The increasing production of e-waste is driving elevated levels of export from developed to developing countries. Although countries worldwide are actively recognising the issues around e-waste and introducing policies, legislation or regulations governing e-waste, a large fraction of e-waste, goes undocumented at its end-of-life. Much of the global e-waste is accumulating in open dumpsites in several African countries. Using available data, we calculate the total e-waste in Africa (locally produced plus imported e-waste) for 2019 to be between 5.8 and 3.4 metric tonnes (Mt). This is believed to be an underestimate, large data gaps exist, hindering more precise estimates. The data is further complicated by, sometimes intentional, differences in labelling and reporting between formal and intermittent informal importers. Based on the available data, the main African recipients of e-waste are Nigeria, Ghana, and Tanzania, with Kenya, Senegal and Egypt featuring as countries of concern. The lack of proper waste management in the recipient developing countries, leads to environmental contamination and human exposure. A coordinated, regional and global, approach is needed in tackling e-waste. Regulatory frameworks, together with monitoring and compliance mechanisms need to be developed, financed, and enforced.

Keywords: Africa; Bamako Convention; Basel Convention; E-waste; EEE; WEEE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThere is no potential conflicting or competing interest that are directly or indirectly related to the work submitted for publication, nor any financial nor non-financial interests to disclose. The research did not involve human participants and/or animals. We have obtained informed consent from all authors.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The African e-waste perspective
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Impacts of e-waste processing in Africa

References

    1. Jambeck JR, Geyer R, Wilcox C, Siegler TR, Perryman M, Andrady A, Narayan R, Law KL. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science. 2015;347:768–771. doi: 10.1126/science.1260352. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Asante KA, Amoyaw-Osei Y, Agusa T. E-waste recycling in Africa: risks and opportunities. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem. 2019;18:109–117. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2019.04.001. - DOI
    1. Daum K, Stoler J, Grant RJ. Toward a more sustainable trajectory for e-waste policy: a review of a decade of e-waste research in Accra. Ghana. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 doi: 10.3390/ijerph14020135. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Forti V, Balde CP, Kuehr R, Bel G (2020) The Global E-waste Monitor - 2020: Quantities, flows and the circular economy potential. United Nations University (UNU)/United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) – co-hosted SCYCLE Programme, International Telecommunication Union (ITU) & International Solid Waste Association (ISWA). Bonn/Geneva/Rotterdam
    1. Mihai F-C, Gnoni M-G, Meidiana C, Ezeah C, Elia V (2019) Chapter 1 - Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE): Flows, Quantities, and Management—A Global Scenario. In: Electronic Waste Management and Treatment Technology. Prasad MNV, Vithanage M (eds) Elsevier Science & Technology Books, pp 1–34. 10.1016/B978-0-12-816190-6.00001-7

LinkOut - more resources