Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 15;6(1):txac002.
doi: 10.1093/tas/txac002. eCollection 2022 Jan.

Effects of water quality on growth performance and health of nursery pigs

Affiliations

Effects of water quality on growth performance and health of nursery pigs

Brigit M Lozinski et al. Transl Anim Sci. .

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to determine the effects of providing drinking water of differing qualities on growth performance and health of nursery pigs. Weanling pigs (n = 450; 150 pigs/group; 10 pigs/pen) were assigned randomly to one of three experimental groups consisting of three water sources of varying qualities: 1) Water source A containing 1,410 ppm hardness (CaCO3 equivalent), 1,120 ppm sulfates, and 1,500 ppm total dissolved solids (TDS); 2) Water source B containing 909 ppm hardness (CaCO3 equivalent), 617 ppm sulfates, and 1,050 ppm TDS; and 3) Water source C containing 235 ppm hardness (CaCO3 equivalent), 2 ppm sulfates, and 348 ppm TDS. Pigs were provided ad libitum access to their respective water sources for the duration of the study which began at weaning (21 d of age) and ended 40 d later (61 d of age). Individual pig weights were recorded weekly along with feed intake on a pen basis. Occurrences of morbidity and mortality were recorded daily. Subjective fecal scores were assigned on a pen basis and blood samples were used to evaluate blood chemistry, cytokine concentrations, and phagocytic activity. A differential sugar absorption test was used to assess intestinal permeability. Fecal grab samples were used to establish diet digestibility, and drinking behavior was video-recorded to assess pigs' acceptance of water sources provided. The statistical model considered fixed effects of water source, room, and their interaction with the random effect of pen. A repeated measures analysis was conducted to determine the effects of water quality over time. There were no differences (P > 0.440) among water sources in average daily gain (A, 0.46 kg/d; B, 0.46 kg/d; C, 0.47 kg/d) or average daily feed intake (A, 0.68 kg/d; B, 0.69 kg/d; C, 0.71 kg/d). Overall mortality of pigs was 0.44% and did not differ across the three water sources. There were no differences in apparent total tract digestibility of the diet, intestinal permeability, immune parameters, or blood chemistry attributable to quality of water consumed by pigs. Pigs did not show an aversion to the water sources provided, because total time pigs spent at the drinker did not differ (P > 0.750) among water sources on days 1 through 3 of the experiment. These data indicate that the water sources of differing quality studied did not affect growth performance or health of nursery pigs.

Keywords: drinking behavior; growth performance; health; nursery pigs; water quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Average water flow rate at each drinker over the 6-wk period in pens with different qualities of water. ∗ Water A (1,410 ppm hardness [CaCO3 equivalent], 1,120 ppm sulfate, 1,500 ppm TDS); Water B (909 ppm hardness [CaCO3 equivalent], 617 ppm sulfate, 1,050 ppm TDS); Water C (235 ppm hardness [CaCO3 equivalent], 2 ppm sulfate, 348 ppm TDS).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Overall growth performance of nursery pigs fed different water sources ∗ Water A (1,410 ppm hardness [CaCO3 equivalent], 1,120 ppm sulfate, 1,500 ppm TDS); Water B (909 ppm hardness [CaCO3 equivalent], 617 ppm sulfate, 1,050 ppm TDS); Water C (235 ppm hardness [CaCO3 equivalent], 2 ppm sulfate, 348 ppm TDS).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Effect of water quality on average daily gain of nursery pigs over time ∗ Water A (1,410 ppm hardness [CaCO3 equivalent], 1,120 ppm sulfate, 1,500 ppm TDS); Water B (909 ppm hardness [CaCO3 equivalent], 617 ppm sulfate, 1,050 ppm TDS); Water C (235 ppm hardness [CaCO3 equivalent], 2 ppm sulfate, 348 ppm TDS).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Effect of water quality on average daily feed intake of nursery pigs over time ∗ Water A (1,410 ppm hardness [CaCO3 equivalent], 1,120 ppm sulfate, 1,500 ppm TDS); Water B (909 ppm hardness [CaCO3 equivalent], 617 ppm sulfate, 1,050 ppm TDS); Water C (235 ppm hardness [CaCO3 equivalent], 2 ppm sulfate, 348 ppm TDS).
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Effect of water quality on gain efficiency of nursery pigs over time ∗ Water A (1,410 ppm hardness [CaCO3 equivalent], 1,120 ppm sulfate, 1,500 ppm TDS); Water B (909 ppm hardness [CaCO3 equivalent], 617 ppm sulfate, 1,050 ppm TDS); Water C (235 ppm hardness [CaCO3 equivalent], 2 ppm sulfate, 348 ppm TDS).
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Effect of water quality on average fecal moisture (%) of nursery pigs over time (days 4 through 7 post-weaning) ∗ Water A (1,410 ppm hardness [CaCO3 equivalent], 1,120 ppm sulfate, 1,500 ppm TDS); Water B (909 ppm hardness [CaCO3 equivalent], 617 ppm sulfate, 1,050 ppm TDS); Water C (235 ppm hardness [CaCO3 equivalent], 2 ppm sulfate, 348 ppm TDS).
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Effect of water quality on total time spent at the drinker during 6 h (0900–1600 h) of each observation day per pig (days 1 through 3 of the experiment) ∗ Water A (1,410 ppm hardness [CaCO3 equivalent], 1,120 ppm sulfate, 1,500 ppm TDS); Water B (909 ppm hardness [CaCO3 equivalent], 617 ppm sulfate, 1,050 ppm TDS); Water C (235 ppm hardness [CaCO3 equivalent], 2 ppm sulfate, 348 ppm TDS).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adeola, O. 2001. Digestion and balance techniques in pigs. In: Lewis A. J. and Souther L. L., editors, Swine nutrition, 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. p. 903.– .
    1. Anderson, J. S., Anderson D. M., and Murphy J. M.. . 1994. The effect of water quality on nutrient availability for grower/finisher pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 74:141–148. doi: 10.4141/cjas94-021 - DOI
    1. AOAC International. 2006. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 18th ed. AOAC Int., Arlington, VA.
    1. Cornelius, C. E. 1980. Liver function. In: Kaneko J. J., editor. Clinical biochemistry of domestic animals. 3rd ed. Academic Press, New York, NY. p. 201–250.
    1. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). 1987. Canadian Water Quality Guidelines. Available upon request from Environment and Climate Change Canada, https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change.html.

LinkOut - more resources