Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 28:4:812200.
doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.812200. eCollection 2022.

Critical Social Science in Sport Management Research: A Scoping Review

Kerri Bodin  1 , Georgia Teare  1 , Marijke Taks  1
Affiliations

Critical Social Science in Sport Management Research: A Scoping Review

Kerri Bodin et al. Front Sports Act Living. .

Abstract

Sport management scholars have called for the application of broader research approaches, including critical social science. Such approaches help uncover the less-desirable aspects of sport and, therefore, offer a basis for positive change. While there have been advancements in the use of innovative research approaches over time, there remains little understanding of how these calls have been addressed. The purpose of this scoping review is to examine trends, gaps, and the use of critical social science and associated approaches in sport management scholarship. Two hundred sixteen relevant articles were identified through a database search (i.e., five platforms), complemented with a manual search of 419 journals. Results indicate that an increase in critical research published in sport management journals was evident following 2005. Findings suggest that there remains space for increased publication of critical social science work in sport management journals and for researchers to better articulate their research approaches in scholarly outputs.

Keywords: philosophical paradigms; research approach; state of the field; systematic reviewing; theoretical contribution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Critical social science publications in sport management per year (N = 216).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Alvesson M., Deetz S. (2000). Doing Critical Management Research, 1st Edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 10.4135/9781849208918 - DOI
    1. Amis J., Silk M. (2005). Rupture: promoting critical and innovative approaches to the study of sport management. J. Sport Manag. 19, 355–366. 10.1123/jsm.19.4.355 - DOI
    1. Anderson E., McCormack M. (2010). Intersectionality, critical race theory, and american sporting oppression: examining black and gay male athletes. J. Homosexual. 57, 949–967. 10.1080/00918369.2010.503502 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arksey H., O'Malley L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 8, 19–32. 10.1080/1364557032000119616 - DOI
    1. Bourdieu P. (1979). La distinction: Critique Sociale du Jugement. Paris: Minuit.

Publication types