Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;42(3):619-632.
doi: 10.1111/opo.12961. Epub 2022 Feb 14.

What are the causes of non-tolerance to new spectacles and how can they be avoided?

Jeremy Beesley  1 , Christopher J Davey  1 , David B Elliott  1
Affiliations

What are the causes of non-tolerance to new spectacles and how can they be avoided?

Jeremy Beesley et al. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 May.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate non-tolerance cases from several UK practices to determine their likely causes and how they might have been avoided.

Methods: Patient complaint and refraction data were collected from non-tolerance recheck examinations. For one practice, clinical data were also collected retrospectively to investigate the quality of the eye examinations.

Results: Data for 279 rechecks were gathered from 10 practices and a recheck frequency of 2.3% was found. The mean patient age was 60 (SD 16) years, with cylinder changes responsible for 38% of prescription-related causes of rechecks, overplusing or underminusing 26%, and underplusing or overminusing just 11%. An assessment of 242 recheck corrections found that 40% were unsatisfactory (e.g., failed to address initial or recheck symptoms, N = 45) and retrospective analysis of 217 case records showed many limitations (e.g., 61% or 28% recorded no uncorrected or habitual visual acuity (VA) at either initial examination or recheck).

Conclusions: Given that overplus-underminus was a much bigger proportion of prescription-related cases than overminus-underplus (26% vs. 11%), the refraction mantra of "maximum plus for maximum VA" should be balanced by increased teaching of the problems of overplusing and underminusing, and the use of prescribing guidelines. In addition, continuing professional development regarding the basics of the recheck examination, refraction, visual acuity and prism determination is needed. Changes of oblique cylinders should be carefully considered in older patients as this is a common cause of non-tolerance. In addition, if the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" and related maxims had been applied to all patients who were asymptomatic at the original examination, one third of all non-tolerance cases could have been avoided. Finally, it would seem appropriate for practices to develop a system to deal better with non-tolerance cases. Perhaps an experienced clinician should examine all patients with non-tolerance and provide feedback to the original clinician.

Keywords: non-tolerance; oblique cylinders; prescribing maxims; progressive addition lenses; recheck examinations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Percentages of eye examinations and rechecks as a function of patient age in years
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bist J, Kaphle D, Marasini S, Kandel H. Spectacle non‐tolerance in clinical practice–a systematic review with meta‐analysis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021;41:610–22. - PubMed
    1. Optical Confederation . Optics at a glance. London: Optical Confederation; 2014.
    1. Cockburn DM. Why patients complain about their new spectacles. Clin Exp Optom 1987;70:91–5.
    1. Buttle FA. Word of mouth: understanding and managing referral marketing. J Strateg Mark. 1998;6:241–54.
    1. Freeman CE, Evans BJ. Investigation of the causes of non‐tolerance to optometric prescriptions for spectacles. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2010;30:1–11. - PubMed