Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 14;17(2):e0263888.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263888. eCollection 2022.

COVID-19 related distress in the Swedish population: Validation of the Swedish version of the COVID Stress Scales (CSS)

Affiliations

COVID-19 related distress in the Swedish population: Validation of the Swedish version of the COVID Stress Scales (CSS)

Anders Carlander et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: The COVID Stress Scales (CSS) assess health- and contamination-related distress in the face of a medical outbreak like the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Though the CSS is translated into 21 languages, it has not been validated in a Swedish national sample.

Aim: Our general objective is to provide a translation, replication, and validation of the CSS and test its convergent- and discriminant validity in relation to anxiety, health anxiety, depression, and stress in the general Swedish population. We also present latent psychometric properties by modelling based on item response theory.

Methods: Participants consisted of 3044 Swedish adults (> 18 years) from a pre-stratified (gender, age, and education) sample from The Swedish Citizen Panel. Mental health status was assessed by validated instruments, including the CSS, PHQ-4, SHAI-14, and PSS-10.

Results: Results indicate that our Swedish translation of CSS has good psychometric properties and consists of 5 correlated factors.

Discussion: The CSS is useful either as a unidimensional or multidimensional construct using the CSS scales to measure key facets of pandemic-related stress.

Conclusions: The findings support the cross-cultural validity of the CSS and its potential utility in understanding many of the emotional challenges posed by the current and future pandemics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Co-author ROB has received institutional research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) and SkyLineDx, speaker honorarium from Roche and Pfizer and has served on advisory boards for Amgen, BD/BARD, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Merck Sharp & Dohme(MSD), Novartis, Roche and Sanofi Genzyme. None of the work is linked in any way to the current manuscript. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Item Information Function (IIF) of CSS.
The Item Information Function (IIF) indicates how much information each CSS-question (css1-css36) can provide from the latent modelled construct of Theta (in this case corresponding to a general COVID-related stress). Some specific questions may provide more information at a relatively higher, or lower, level of Theta depending on for example question specificity and phrasing. The level Theta is standardized and in this particular case levels higher than zero on the x-axis may be assumed to assess a higher degree of COVID-related stress compared to values lower than zero where the COVID-related stress may be less salient. The y-axis represents level of information and indicates where on the Theta scale each item is most sensitive. In Fig 1 we can see that most items have a curve that is flat at the top which entails that they can provide the same amount of information at a relatively wide range of Theta. For example, item 21 provides the most information compared to the other items, and it demonstrates approximately the same level of sensitivity from a level of nearly -2 to 2 of Theta.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Test Information Function (TIF) of CSS.
The Test Information Function (TIF) is an aggregate measure of the Item Information Function (IIF) presented in Fig 1. The TIF shows how the entire instrument (css1-css36 combined) performs at different levels of Theta and at what level or magnitude of the latent construct that we can retrieve as much information as possible. Fig 2 shows that the CSS instrument provides the most information approximately at a Theta level of 2 and, conversely, that the margin of error (SE) is at the lowest point at this particular level, meaning that the precision of the CSS-questions is likely higher at a higher level of COVID-related stress.

References

    1. Taylor S. The psychology of pandemics: preparing for the next global outbreak of infectious disease. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2019.
    1. Paulus MP, Yu AJ. Emotion and decision-making: affect-driven belief systems in anxiety and depression. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012;16(9):476–83. Epub 2012/08/18. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.07.009 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bishop SJ, Gagne C. Anxiety, Depression, and Decision Making: A Computational Perspective. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2018;41:371–88. Epub 2018/05/02. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-080317-062007 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taylor S, Landry CA, Paluszek MM, Fergus TA, McKay D, Asmundson GJG. Development and initial validation of the COVID Stress Scales. J Anxiety Disord. 2020;72:102232. Epub 2020/05/15. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102232 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Asmundson GJG, Taylor S. Coronaphobia: Fear and the 2019-nCoV outbreak. J Anxiety Disord. 2020;70:102196. Epub 2020/02/23. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102196 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types