Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan 26;11(3):613.
doi: 10.3390/jcm11030613.

Temporary Right-Ventricular Assist Devices: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Temporary Right-Ventricular Assist Devices: A Systematic Review

Mahmoud Abdelshafy et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Acute right-sided heart failure (RHF) is a complex clinical syndrome, with a wide range of clinical presentations, associated with increased mortality and morbidity, but about which there is a scarcity of evidence-based literature. A temporary right-ventricular assist device (t-RVAD) is a potential treatment option for selected patients with severe right-ventricular dysfunction as a bridge-to-recovery or as a permanent solution. We sought to conduct a systematic review to determine the safety and efficacy of t-RVAD implantation. Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria, from which data were extracted. Successful t-RVAD weaning ranged between 23% and 100%. Moreover, 30-day survival post-temporary RAVD implantation ranged from 46% to 100%. Bleeding, acute kidney injury, stroke, and device malfunction were the most commonly reported complications. Notwithstanding this, t-RVAD is a lifesaving option for patients with severe RHF, but the evidence stems from small non-randomized heterogeneous studies utilizing a variety of devices. Both the etiology of RHF and time of intervention might play a major role in determining the t-RVAD outcome. Standardized endpoints definitions, design and methodology for t-RVAD trials is needed. Furthermore, efforts should continue in improving the technology as well as improving the timely provision of a t-RVAD.

Keywords: efficacy; right-sided heart failure; safety; systematic review; temporary right ventricular assist device.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow chart of the data.

References

    1. Konstam M.A., Kiernan M.S., Bernstein D., Bozkurt B., Jacob M., Kapur N.K., Kociol R.D., Lewis E.F., Mehra M.R., Pagani F.D., et al. Evaluation and Management of Right-Sided Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137:e578–e622. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000560. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Soliman O., Muslem R., Caliskan K. Right heart failure syndrome. Aging. 2018;11:7–8. doi: 10.18632/aging.101708. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kapur N.K., Esposito M.L., Bader Y., Morine K.J., Kiernan M.S., Pham D.T., Burkhoff D. Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Acute Right Ventricular Failure. Circulation. 2017;136:314–326. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025290. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dandel M., Hetzer R. Temporary assist device support for the right ventricle: Pre-implant and post-implant challenges. Heart Fail. Rev. 2018;23:157–171. doi: 10.1007/s10741-018-9678-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G., Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources